Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989474›Full record

Observational studyClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020

Age, Gleason Score, and PSA are important prognostic factors for survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Results of The Uroncor Group (Uro-Oncological Tumors) of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR).

J Valero, P Peleteiro, I Henríquez, A Conde, T Piquer, A Lozano, C C Soler, J Muñoz, A Illescas, J Jove and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

J ValeroHospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain. jvalero@hmhospitales.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3506-5088
P PeleteiroHospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago, Spain.
I HenríquezHospital Universitario Sant Joan de Reus, Tarragona, Spain.
A CondeHospital La Fe de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
T PiquerHospital de Castellon, Castellón, Spain.
A LozanoHospital Virgen de la Arrixaca de Murcia, El Palmar, Spain.
C C SolerHospital Torrecardenas Almeria, Almería, Spain.
J MuñozHospital Universitario Infanta Cristina de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain.
A IllescasHospital Virgen de la Macarena de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
J JoveInstituto Catalan de Oncologia Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
M M FloresHospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain.
J BaquedanoHospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain.
P DiezhandinoHospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
R P de CelisHospital Txagorritxu de Vitoria, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
E H PardoHospital Txagorritxu de Vitoria, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
P SamperHospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos de Mostoles, Madrid, Spain.
I VillosladaHospital Gomez Ulla de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
M EguigurenHospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
V MillanHospital Clinico Universitario de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Hospital Txagorritxu · ESHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova · ESComplejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas · ESComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESFundación Hospital Provincial de Castellón · ESHospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa · ESHospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Cristina · ESHospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESHospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus · ESInstitut Català d'Ornitologia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has changed significantly in recent years. Inhibitors of androgen receptors have shown especially significant benefits in overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), with a good toxicity profile. Treatment selection depends on the patient's individual clinical, radiological, and biological characteristics.

objectiveTo describe treatment outcomes (efficacy, toxicity) in a cohort of patients with mCRPC in Spain. MATERIALS AND

methodsMulticenter, retrospective study of patients with mCRPC included in a database of the Urological Tumour Working Group (URONCOR) of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR). Metastatic CRPC was defined according to the prostate cancer working group 3 (PCWG3) criteria. The Kaplan-Meier technique was used to evaluate OS and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v.4.0) were used to assess toxicity. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the factors significantly associated with OS.

resultsA total of 314 patients from 17 hospitals in Spain diagnosed with mCRPC between June 2010 and September 2017 were included in this study. Mean age at diagnosis was 68 years (range 45-89). At a median follow-up of 35 months, OS at 1, 3, and 5 years were 92%, 38%, and 28%, respectively. Grades 1-2 and grade 3 toxicity rates were, respectively, 68% and 19%. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. On the multivariate analysis, the following factors were significantly associated with OS: age (hazard ratio [HR] 0.42, p = 0.010), PSA value at diagnosis of mCRPC (HR 0.55, p = 0.008), and Gleason score (HR 0.61, p = 0.009).

conclusionsAge, Gleason score, and PSA at diagnosis of mCRPC are independently associated with overall survival in patients with mCRPC. The efficacy and toxicity outcomes in this patient cohort treated in radiation oncology departments in Spain are consistent with previous reports.

Indexed as

Age FactorsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisProstate-Specific AntigenRadiation OncologyRegression AnalysisAntineoplastic AgentsProstate-Specific AntigenAndrogen deprivationMetastatic CRPCPrognostic factorProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID31989474
OpenAlexW3002364671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.