Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989442›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2020

Automatic Brain Extraction for Rodent MRI Images.

Yikang Liu, Hayreddin Said Unsal, Yi Tao, Nanyin Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yikang LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Hayreddin Said UnsalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Yi TaoDepartment of Mathematics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Nanyin ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. nuz2@psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5824-9058
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Mechanistic dissection of the neural basis of the resting-state fMRI signal using multi-modal approachesRF1MH114224 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI DREW, PATRICK JAMES, ZHANG, NANYIN · 2017 to 2018
$3.8M
Resting-state Neural Networks in Awake RodentsR01NS085200 · NINDS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI ZHANG, NANYIN · 2013 to 2024
$3.4M
Longitudinal assessment of trauma on neural circuitry development into adulthoodR01MH098003 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI KING, JEAN A, ZHANG, NANYIN · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098003NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH114224NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodent models are increasingly important in translational neuroimaging research. In rodent neuroimaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, brain extraction is a critical data preprocessing component. Current brain extraction methods for rodent MRI usually require manual adjustment of input parameters due to widely different image qualities and/or contrasts. Here we propose a novel method, termed SHape descriptor selected Extremal Regions after Morphologically filtering (SHERM), which only requires a brain template mask as the input and is capable of automatically and reliably extracting the brain tissue in both rat and mouse MRI images. The method identifies a set of brain mask candidates, extracted from MRI images morphologically opened and closed sequentially with multiple kernel sizes, that match the shape of the brain template. These brain mask candidates are then merged to generate the brain mask. This method, along with four other state-of-the-art rodent brain extraction methods, were benchmarked on four separate datasets including both rat and mouse MRI images. Without involving any parameter tuning, our method performed comparably to the other four methods on all datasets, and its performance was robust with stably high true positive rates and low false positive rates. Taken together, this study provides a reliable automatic brain extraction method that can contribute to the establishment of automatic pipelines for rodent neuroimaging data analysis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceNeuroimagingRatsBrain extractionMaximally stable extremal region (MSER)RodentShape descriptor

Identifiers

PMID31989442
PMCPMC7343626
OpenAlexW3003587036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.