ArticleMolecular biology reports2020
A comprehensive molecular analysis and genotype-phenotype correlation in patients with familial mediterranean fever.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of homozygous mutations in exon 10 on musculoskeletal findings in children with familial mediterranean fever.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Genetic and clinical features of familial Mediterranean fever in a cohort of patients with kidney failure.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- Molecular analyses of MEFV gene mutation variants in Turkish population.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- A score for predicting colchicine resistance at the time of diagnosis in familial Mediterranean fever: data from the TURPAID registry.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Genewise detection of variants inFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Review
- Phenotype-genotype correlation in children with familial Mediterranean fever in Morocco.Qatar medical journal · 2024Article
- Not easy-peasy to diagnose: familial Mediterranean fever unaccompanied by fever.European journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Recurrent Fever with Oral Lesions in Egyptian Children: A Familial Mediterranean Fever Diagnosis Not to Be Missed.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Phenotypic characterization of Familial Mediterranean Fever patients harboring variants of uncertain significanceTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
- Multifactorial Rare Diseases: Can Uncertainty Analysis Bring Added Value to the Search for Risk Factors and Etiopathogenesis?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Familial Mediterranean fever is an auto inflammatory genetic disease involving especially Turks, Armenians, Arabs and non-Ashkenazi Jews and caused by variants in the MEFV gene. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the distribution and frequency of clinical, MEFV gene variants in FMF patients and the relationship between mutations in different exons and phenotype-genotype and clinical findings. 1028 patients diagnosed as FMF were included. The most common genotypes were M694V / R202Q heterozygous (10.4%), M694V homozygous (7.5%), M694V / E148Q / R202Q heterozygous (4.6%), V726A heterozygous (4.5%), M680I heterozygous (4.2%). c.1611-1 G > C, G152R, S104C, R116S, E336K, R461Q mutations were detected in the literature for the first time in FMF patients. We also divided the patients into 4 groups according to whether the MEFV mutations were exon 10 or non-exon 10. The first group consisted of non-exon 10 homozygous or compound heterozygous (n = 180) patients, Group 2 consisted of exon 10- non-exon 10 compound heterozygous (n = 318) patients, Group 3 consisted of exon 10 homozygous or compound heterozygous (n = 256) patients, while Group 4 consisted of heterozygous (n = 227) patients at any exon. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of abdominal pain, arthritis, arthralgia, vomiting diarrhea, erysipelas like rash, amyloidosis, renal failure family history. There was no difference in fever between Group 1 (55.6%) and 2 (62.3%); however, these two groups were different from Group 3 (75.8%) and 4 (76.7%). Group 3 (18.8%) had the highest rate of appendectomy. In addition, allele frequencies of all mutations detected in the analyses were compared with allele frequencies of healthy people in the gnomad database. It is useful to analyse all exons in the MEFV gene with the next generation sequence analysis in the detection of FMF disease. S104C, R116S, G152R, E336K, R461Q, L508Q and c.1611-1 G > C mutations are also new variants in literature. c.1611-1 G > C is a possible pathogenic variant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.