Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989423›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2020

Reduction of chromium-VI by chromium-resistant Escherichia coli FACU: a prospective bacterium for bioremediation.

Mahmoud S M Mohamed, Nagwa I El-Arabi, Ahmed El-Hussein, Shereen Abu El-Maaty, Abdelhadi A Abdelhadi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Functional genomic analysis ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Draft genome analysis forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biotreatment of Cr(VI) and pyrene combined water pollution by loofa-immobilized bacteria.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  17. Hexavalent chromium reducing bacteria: mechanism of reduction and characteristics.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  18. Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  19. A Bioactive Fraction fromJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  20. Chromium Pollution in European Water, Sources, Health Risk, and Remediation Strategies: An Overview.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahmoud S M MohamedBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt.
Nagwa I El-ArabiDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt.
Ahmed El-HusseinThe National Institute of Laser Enhanced Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Shereen Abu El-MaatyDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt.
Abdelhadi A AbdelhadiDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt. abdelhadi.abdallah@agr.cu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4700-4490
Cairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The release of hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI)] into environments has resulted in many undesirable interactions with biological systems for its toxic potential and mutagenicity. Chromate reduction via chromium reductase (ChrR) is a key strategy for detoxifying Cr (VI) to trivalent species of no toxicity. In this study, ten bacterial isolates were isolated from heavily polluted soils, with a strain assigned as FACU, being the most efficient one able to reduce Cr (VI). FACU was identified as Escherichia coli based on morphological and 16S rRNA sequence analyses. Growth parameters and enzymatic actions of FACU were tested under different experimental conditions, in the presence of toxic chromium species. The E. coli FACU was able to reduce chromate at 100 μg/mL conceivably by reducing Cr (VI) into the less harmful Cr (III). Two distinctive optical spectroscopic techniques have been employed throughout the study. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was utilized as qualitative analysis to demonstrate the presence of chromium with the distinctive spectral lines for bacteria such as Ca, Fe, and Na. While UV-visible spectroscopy was incorporated to confirm the reduction capabilities of E. coli after comparing Cr (III) spectrum to that of bacterial product spectrum and they were found to be identical. The chromate reductase specific activity was 361.33 μmol/L of Cr (VI) per min per mg protein. The FACU (EMCC 2289) 16S rRNA sequence and the ChrR-partially isolated gene were submitted to the DDBJ under acc. # numbers LC177419 and LC179020, respectively. The results support that FACU is a promising source of ChrR capable of bioremediation of toxic chromium species.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalCarcinogens, EnvironmentalChromiumDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsOxidation-ReductionOxidoreductasesPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil MicrobiologyCarcinogens, Environmentalchromate reductaseChromiumchromium hexavalent ionEscherichia coli ProteinsOxidoreductasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBioremediationChromate reductaseE. coliHexavalent chromiumLIBS

Identifiers

PMID31989423
OpenAlexW3003240901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.