ReviewJournal of digital imaging2020
Computer-Aided Histopathological Image Analysis Techniques for Automated Nuclear Atypia Scoring of Breast Cancer: a Review.
Review in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning in breast cancer histopathology: predicting and detecting axillary lymph node metastasis.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- NucFuseRank: Dataset Fusion and Performance Ranking for Nuclei Instance Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bridging traditional and deep learning methods in H&E histological image normalization: a comprehensive review and introducing a novel framework for comparative analyses.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- GHMS-CycleGAN: Graph-Based Hierarchical Multi-stain CycleGAN for Stain Normalization and Classification in Digital Pathology.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis in diagnostic decisions: 5 questions for medical informatics and human-computer interface research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Review
- An Information-Extreme Algorithm for Universal Nuclear Feature-Driven Automated Classification of Breast Cancer Cells.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multimodal AI model for preoperative prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer using whole slide images.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based fusion model for predicting HER2 expression in breast cancer by Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasound: a multicenter study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Modification of the nuclear pleomorphism score in the Modified Bloom-Richardson grading for invasive breast cancer.PloS one · 2025Article
- Integration of histopathological image features and multi-dimensional omics data in predicting molecular features and survival in glioblastoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Deep learning approaches for breast cancer detection in histopathology images: A review.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2024Review
- Anti-obesity effects of olivetol in adult zebrafish model induced by short-term high-fat diet.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Deep Learning for Medical Image-Based Cancer Diagnosis.Cancers · 2023Review
- Reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies for mammographic BI-RADS 4 lesions through a deep transfer learning method.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- An Investigation about Modern Deep Learning Strategies for Colon Carcinoma Grading.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Classification of Breast Lesions on DCE-MRI Data Using a Fine-Tuned MobileNet.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automated Lung Cancer Segmentation in Tissue Micro Array Analysis Histopathological Images Using a Prototype of Computer-Assisted Diagnosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Deep learning-based breast cancer grading and survival analysis on whole-slide histopathology images.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Chaotic Sparrow Search Algorithm with Deep Transfer Learning Enabled Breast Cancer Classification on Histopathological Images.Cancers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common type of malignancy diagnosed in women. Through early detection and diagnosis, there is a great chance of recovery and thereby reduce the mortality rate. Many preliminary tests like non-invasive radiological diagnosis using ultrasound, mammography, and MRI are widely used for the diagnosis of breast cancer. However, histopathological analysis of breast biopsy specimen is inevitable and is considered to be the golden standard for the affirmation of cancer. With the advancements in the digital computing capabilities, memory capacity, and imaging modalities, the development of computer-aided powerful analytical techniques for histopathological data has increased dramatically. These automated techniques help to alleviate the laborious work of the pathologist and to improve the reproducibility and reliability of the interpretation. This paper reviews and summarizes digital image computational algorithms applied on histopathological breast cancer images for nuclear atypia scoring and explores the future possibilities. The algorithms for nuclear pleomorphism scoring of breast cancer can be widely grouped into two categories: handcrafted feature-based and learned feature-based. Handcrafted feature-based algorithms mainly include the computational steps like pre-processing the images, segmenting the nuclei, extracting unique features, feature selection, and machine learning-based classification. However, most of the recent algorithms are based on learned features, that extract high-level abstractions directly from the histopathological images utilizing deep learning techniques. In this paper, we discuss the various algorithms applied for the nuclear pleomorphism scoring of breast cancer, discourse the challenges to be dealt with, and outline the importance of benchmark datasets. A comparative analysis of some prominent works on breast cancer nuclear atypia scoring is done using a benchmark dataset which enables to quantitatively measure and compare the different features and algorithms used for breast cancer grading. Results show that improvements are still required, to have an automated cancer grading system suitable for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.