ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2020
Patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05724758 (Patient Reported Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Patient Reported Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oncoplastic versus conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer: a pooled analysis of 6941 female patients.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Pooled it
- Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Access to Results of Patient Reported Outcome Surveys Does Not Improve Survey Response Rates.The Journal of surgical research · 2023Trial
- Cosmetic Outcomes Following Breast-Conservation Surgery and Radiation for Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: Data from the Alliance Z11102 Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2020Trial
- Macroareolar Changes following Periareolar Mastopexy: A Postoperative Assessment.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Essentials for optimizing outcomes in oncoplastic breast reconstruction.Gland surgery · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of level II oncoplastic surgery and conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer with a ductal carcinoma in situ component.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Application of Structured Education Management in Standardized Treatment of Cancer Pain.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
- Optimizing Outcomes in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Techniques for Centrally Located Breast Cancer.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of Oncological and Aesthetic Outcomes between Tissue Rearrangement Technique and Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Flap Reconstruction in Cases of Upper Outer Quadrant Breast Cancer.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- A Clinical Analysis of Prognosis and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Patient Satisfaction, Esthetic Outcome, and Quality of Life in Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Single Center Experience.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Oncoplastic surgery in the USA: a review of where we started, where we are today and where we are headed.Gland surgery · 2024Review
- Shoulder function following oncoplastic breast conserving surgery-a narrative review.Gland surgery · 2024Review
- Disparities in quality of life among patients with breast cancer based on surgical methods: a cross-sectional prospective study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Health-related quality of life by type of breast surgery in women with primary breast cancer: prospective longitudinal cohort study.BJS open · 2024Article
- Clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes after oncoplastic breast surgery in breast cancer patients: A matched cohort study.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2024Article
- Narrative review of patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Comparison of the Quality of Recovery-15 score in patients undergoing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery under monitored anesthesia care versus general anesthesia: a prospective quality improvement study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) has developed as an extension of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in an effort to improve esthetic and functional outcome following surgery for breast cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible benefits of OBS, as compared with BCS, with regard to health-related quality of life (HRQoL), using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients treated with OBS (n = 200) and BCS (n = 1304) in the period 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2013 were identified in a research database and in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) registry. Data on patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were retrieved from the DBCG registry. Patients were sent a survey including the Breast-Q™ BCT postoperative module and a study-specific questionnaire (SSQ) in 2016. A good outcome in the Breast-Q module was defined as above the median. OBS was compared to BCS using a logistic regression analysis, and then adjusted for potential confounders, yielding odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals.
resultsThere was a statistically significant better outcome considering the HRQoL domain "Psychosocial Well-being " for patients treated with OBS as compared with BCS (OR 2.15: 1.25-3.69). No statistically significant differences were found for the domains "Physical Well-being" (0.83: 0.50-1.39), "Satisfaction with Breast" (0.95: 0.57-1.59), or "Sexual Well-being" (1.42: 0.78-2.58).
conclusionThe present study indicates better outcomes of HRQoL for breast cancer patients treated with OBS as compared to patients treated with BCS. There was no increase in physical discomfort among OBS patients despite more extensive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.