Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989335›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2020

Measuring pH and Buffer Capacity in Fluids Aspirated from the Fasted Upper Gastrointestinal Tract of Healthy Adults.

Chara Litou, Dimitrios Psachoulias, Maria Vertzoni, Jennifer Dressman, Christos Reppas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Chara LitouInstitute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Biocenter, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Max von Laue St. 9, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Dimitrios PsachouliasDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 157 84, Zografou, Greece.
Maria VertzoniDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 157 84, Zografou, Greece.
Jennifer DressmanInstitute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Biocenter, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Max von Laue St. 9, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. dressman@em.uni-frankfurt.de.
Christos ReppasDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 157 84, Zografou, Greece. reppas@pharm.uoa.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6958-2147
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 674909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe design of biorelevant conditions for in vitro evaluation of orally administered drug products is contingent on obtaining accurate values for physiologically relevant parameters such as pH, buffer capacity and bile salt concentrations in upper gastrointestinal fluids.

methodsThe impact of sample handling on the measurement of pH and buffer capacity of aspirates from the upper gastrointestinal tract was evaluated, with a focus on centrifugation and freeze-thaw cycling as factors that can influence results. Since bicarbonate is a key buffer system in the fasted state and is used to represent conditions in the upper intestine in vitro, variations on sample handling were also investigated for bicarbonate-based buffers prepared in the laboratory.

resultsCentrifugation and freezing significantly increase pH and decrease buffer capacity in samples obtained by aspiration from the upper gastrointestinal tract in the fasted state and in bicarbonate buffers prepared in vitro. Comparison of data suggested that the buffer system in the small intestine does not derive exclusively from bicarbonates.

conclusionsMeasurement of both pH and buffer capacity immediately after aspiration are strongly recommended as "best practice" and should be adopted as the standard procedure for measuring pH and buffer capacity in aspirates from the gastrointestinal tract. Only data obtained in this way provide a valid basis for setting the physiological parameters in physiologically based pharmacokinetic models.

Indexed as

BicarbonatesBile Acids and SaltsBody FluidsBuffersFamotidineGastrointestinal AbsorptionHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIbuprofenIntestine, SmallSaltsStomachUpper Gastrointestinal TractBicarbonatesBile Acids and SaltsBuffersFamotidineIbuprofenSaltsBicarbonatesbuffer capacityhuman intestinal fluidpHsmall intestinestomach

Identifiers

PMID31989335
OpenAlexW3000920985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.