Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989293›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2020

Does birthweight have a role in the effect of episiotomy on anal sphincter injury?

Gabriel Levin, Amihai Rottenstreich, Tal Cahan, Hadas Ilan, Daniel Shai, Abraham Tsur, Raanan Meyer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Berlin survey on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI).Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriel Levin *The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amihai Rottenstreich *The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Tal CahanThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Hadas IlanThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Daniel ShaiThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Abraham TsurThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Raanan MeyerThe Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel. raananmeir@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0720-4343
Sheba Medical Center · ILHadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMost professional guidelines advise against routine episiotomy during vaginal delivery, although mounting evidence supports its protective role regarding obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). We aimed to study the effect of lateral and mediolateral episiotomies on the rate of OASI in relation to birthweight among nulliparous women undergoing vaginal delivery.

methodsA historical cohort study was conducted of all nulliparous women who delivered vaginally at term between 2011 and 2019 at a tertiary university hospital. Women were allocated into two groups: (1) with OASI and (2) without OASI. Episiotomy performance and birthweight groups were analyzed.

resultsOverall, 22,250 deliveries were analyzed for inclusion: 18,533 (83.3%) spontaneous vaginal deliveries (SVD), 3222 (14.5%) vacuum-assisted deliveries (VAD) and 495 (2.2%) forceps deliveries. Total episiotomy and OASI rate was 48.2% and 1.7%, respectively. Episiotomy rate was lower in the OASI group as compared to the no OASI group (158 (41.3%) vs. 10,568 (48.3%), OR 0.75, 0.61-0.92, p = 0.006). Median birthweight was higher for OASI group neonates (3355 vs. 3160, p < 0.001). In SVDs, episiotomy decreased the rate of OASI in neonatal birthweight groups of 3000-3499, 3500-3999 and > 4000 g (OR 0.56, 0.38-0.82, p = 0.003; 0.66, 0.45-0.99, p = 0.04 and 0.24, 0.07-0.78, p = 0.01, respectively). In VADs, episiotomy decreased the rate of OASI in the neonatal weight groups of 2500-2999 and 3000-3499 g (OR 0.36, 0.14-0.89, p = 0.02 and OR 0.38, 0.19-0.75, p = 0.004, respectively).

conclusionsLateral and mediolateral episiotomies are independent modifiable predictors of OASI, protective against OASI in SVDs when neonates weigh > 3000 g and 2500-3499 g in VADs.

Indexed as

AdultAnal CanalBirth WeightCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricEpisiotomyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBirthweightLateral episiotomyNulliparousObstetric anal sphincter injuryVacuum-assisted delivery

Identifiers

PMID31989293
OpenAlexW3003929190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.