Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989285›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2020

Deep learning-based automated detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy on color fundus photographs.

Feng Li, Lei Yan, Yuguang Wang, Jianxun Shi, Hua Chen, Xuedian Zhang, Minshan Jiang, Zhizheng Wu, Kaiqian Zhou

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic accuracy of image-based deep learning for glaucomatous optic neuropathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Feng LiSchool of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Lei YanSchool of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Yuguang WangSchool of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Jianxun ShiSchool of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Hua ChenSchool of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Xuedian ZhangSchool of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Minshan JiangSchool of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China. jiangmsc@gmail.com.
Zhizheng WuDepartment of Precision Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Kaiqian ZhouLiver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, 200032, China.
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology · CNShanghai University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51675321National Natural Science Foundation of China 61905144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a deep learning approach based on deep residual neural network (ResNet101) for the automated detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) using color fundus images, understand the process by which the model makes predictions, and explore the effect of the integration of fundus images and the medical history data from patients.

methodsA total of 34,279 fundus images and the corresponding medical history data were retrospectively collected from cohorts of 2371 adult patients, and these images were labeled by 8 glaucoma experts, in which 26,585 fundus images (12,618 images with GON-confirmed eyes, 1114 images with GON-suspected eyes, and 12,853 NORMAL eye images) were included. We adopted 10-fold cross-validation strategy to train and optimize our model. This model was tested in an independent testing dataset consisting of 3481 images (1524 images from NORMAL eyes, 1442 images from GON-confirmed eyes, and 515 images from GON-suspected eyes) from 249 patients. Moreover, the performance of the best model was compared with results obtained by two experts. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, kappa value, and area under receiver operating characteristic (AUC) were calculated. Further, we performed qualitative evaluation of model predictions and occlusion testing. Finally, we assessed the effect of integrating medical history data in the final classification.

resultsIn a multiclass comparison between GON-confirmed eyes, GON-suspected eyes and NORMAL eyes, our model achieved 0.941 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.936-0.946) accuracy, 0.957 (95% CI, 0.953-0.961) sensitivity, and 0.929 (95% CI, 0.923-0.935) specificity. The AUC distinguishing referrals (GON-confirmed and GON-suspected eyes) from observation was 0.992 (95% CI, 0.991-0.993). Our best model had a kappa value of 0.927, while the two experts' kappa values were 0.928 and 0.925 independently. The best 2 binary classifiers distinguishing GON-confirmed/GON-suspected eyes from NORMAL eyes obtained 0.955, 0.965 accuracy, 0.977, 0.998 sensitivity, and 0.929, 0.954 specificity, while the AUC was 0.992, 0.999 respectively. Additionally, the occlusion testing showed that our model identified the neuroretinal rim region, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defect areas (superior or inferior) as the most important parts for the discrimination of GON, which evaluated fundus images in a way similar to clinicians. Finally, the results of integration of fundus images with medical history data showed a slight improvement in sensitivity and specificity with similar AUCs.

conclusionsThis approach could discriminate GON with high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC using color fundus photographs. It may provide a second opinion on the diagnosis of glaucoma to the specialist quickly, efficiently and at low cost, and assist doctors and the public in large-scale screening for glaucoma.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalNeural Networks, ComputerGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureOptic DiskOptic Nerve DiseasesRetinal Ganglion CellsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTomography, Optical CoherenceAutomated detectionColor fundus photographsDeep residual neural networkGlaucomatous optic neuropathyIntegration of medical data

Identifiers

PMID31989285
OpenAlexW3004396616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.