Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989202›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2020

Subjective versus objective determination of bladder emptying following urogynecological surgery: "do you feel that you completely emptied your bladder?"

Kendra Kesty, Autumn Edenfield, Daniela Castro, Loreto Medina, Michel Naser, Valentín Manríquez, Steven Swift

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kendra KestyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Charleston, SC, MSC 619, USA.
Autumn EdenfieldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Charleston, SC, MSC 619, USA.
Daniela CastroDivision of Urogynecology, Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile (HCUCH), Santos Dumont 999, Independencia, Santiago, Chile.
Loreto MedinaDivision of Urogynecology, Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile (HCUCH), Santos Dumont 999, Independencia, Santiago, Chile.
Michel NaserDivision of Urogynecology, Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile (HCUCH), Santos Dumont 999, Independencia, Santiago, Chile.
Valentín ManríquezDivision of Urogynecology, Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile (HCUCH), Santos Dumont 999, Independencia, Santiago, Chile.
Steven SwiftDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Charleston, SC, MSC 619, USA. swifts@musc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7765-0250
Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile · CLMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisWe tested the hypothesis that women can subjectively determine if they have emptied their bladder after a spontaneous voiding attempt following urogynecological surgery to rule out post-operative urinary retention as determined by a voiding trial.

methodsThis is a prospective observational study of women undergoing urogynecological surgery at two academic institutions from June 2016 to March 2019. Following surgery, subjects underwent a voiding trial followed by measurement of the PVR via ultrasound bladder scan or straight catheterization. A successful voiding trial was defined as a PVR of ≤150 ml. Subjects were queried about their subjective sensation of bladder emptying; "Do you feel that you completely emptied your bladder?" Their responses were either "Yes", "No" or "I don't know". Their subjective responses were correlated with the voiding trial results using a Chi-squared analysis for sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV).

resultsA total of 266 subjects were included in the final evaluation. The screening subjective question had a sensitivity of 85.7% (CI 71.46 to 94.57%), a specificity of 91.5% (CI 87.01 to 94.79%), a PPV of 65.4% (CI 54.78 to 74.77%), and an NPV of 97.14% (CI 94.18 to 98.62%) to detect a failed voiding trial.

conclusionsThe NPV of the subjective question regarding bladder emptying in the post-operative urogynecological setting is high at >97%, suggesting that it might be reasonable to forgo a formal voiding trial in patients who subjectively feel that they have emptied their bladder.

Indexed as

Urinary RetentionUrination DisordersFemaleHumansUltrasonographyUrinary BladderUrinationUrodynamicsPost-operative urinary retentionPost-void residualSubjective response

Identifiers

PMID31989202
OpenAlexW3001918073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.