Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989169›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2019

A Guide to Representational Similarity Analysis for Social Neuroscience.

Haroon Popal, Yin Wang, Ingrid R Olson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Can conceptual beliefs shape impressions from voices?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Comparison of Human and Machine Performance in Object Recognition.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haroon PopalDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Yin WangBeijing Normal University.
Ingrid R OlsonDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

The Neural Basis of Social KnowledgeR01MH091113 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLSON, INGRID R · 2010 to 2019
$3.7M
The Neural Basis of Social KnowledgeR56MH091113 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLSON, INGRID R · 2020 to 2020
$375k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091113NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH091113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Representational similarity analysis (RSA) is a computational technique that uses pairwise comparisons of stimuli to reveal their representation in higher-order space. In the context of neuroimaging, mass-univariate analyses and other multivariate analyses can provide information on what and where information is represented but have limitations in their ability to address how information is represented. Social neuroscience is a field that can particularly benefit from incorporating RSA techniques to explore hypotheses regarding the representation of multidimensional data, how representations can predict behavior, how representations differ between groups and how multimodal data can be compared to inform theories. The goal of this paper is to provide a practical as well as theoretical guide to implementing RSA in social neuroscience studies.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorStatistics as TopicBrain MappingComputational BiologyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultivariate AnalysisNeurosciencesfMRImultivariate pattern analysisrepresentational similarity analysissocial neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID31989169
PMCPMC7057283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.