ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2020
Microfluidic hemophilia models using blood from healthy donors.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Synergistic Overview between Microfluidics and Numerical Research for Vascular Flow and Pathological Investigations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Structure of Blood Coagulation Factor VIII in Complex With an Anti-C2 Domain Non-Classical, Pathogenic Antibody Inhibitor.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Microfluidic hemophilia models using blood from healthy donors.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicrofluidic clotting assays permit drug action studies for hemophilia therapeutics under flow. However, limited availability of patient samples and Inter-donor variability limit the application of such assays, especially with many patients on prophylaxis.
objectiveTo develop approaches to phenocopy hemophilia using modified healthy blood in microfluidic assays.
methodsCorn trypsin inhibitor (4 µg/mL)-treated healthy blood was dosed with either anti-factor VIII (FVIII; hemophilia A model) or a recombinant factor IX (FIX) missense variant (FIX-V181T; hemophilia B model). Treated blood was perfused at 100 s
resultsAnti-FVIII partially blocked fibrin production on collagen/TF, but completely blocked fibrin production on collagen/FXIa, a phenotype reversed with 1 µmol/L bispecific antibody (emicizumab), which binds FIXa and factor X. As expected, emicizumab had no significant effect on healthy blood (no anti-FVIII present) perfused over collagen/FXIa. The efficacy of emicizumab in anti-FVIII-treated healthy blood phenocopied the action of emicizumab in the blood of a patient with hemophilia A perfused over collagen/FXIa. Interestingly, a patient-derived FVIII-neutralizing antibody reduced fibrin production when added to healthy blood perfused over collagen/FXIa. For low TF surfaces, reFIX-V181T (50 µg/mL) fully blocked platelet and fibrin deposition, a phenotype fully reversed with anti-TFPI.
conclusionTwo new microfluidic hemophilia A and B models demonstrate the potency of anti-TF pathway inhibitor, emicizumab, and a patient-derived inhibitory antibody. Using collagen/FXIa-coated surfaces resulted in reliable and highly sensitive hemophilia models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.