ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2020
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis to validate the synergy between PARP1 inhibition and chemotherapy in
Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative strategies to overcome cancer drug resistance: from nanodelivery systems to targeted therapeutics.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Advances in RNA-based cancer therapeutics: pre-clinical and clinical implications.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Multidrug Resistance: Are We Still Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Revolutionising cancer intervention: the repercussions of CAR-T cell therapy on modern oncology practices.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Advanced gene therapy system for the treatment of solid tumour: A review.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Article
- Comprehensive review of CRISPR-based gene editing: mechanisms, challenges, and applications in cancer therapy.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- CRISPR-Cas9 in basic and translational aspects of cancer therapy.BioImpacts : BI · 2024Review
- gRNA Design: How Its Evolution Impacted on CRISPR/Cas9 Systems Refinement.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- GPR19 Coordinates Multiple Molecular Aspects of Stress Responses Associated with the Aging Process.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 as a therapeutic tool for triple negative breast cancer: from bench to clinics.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- Nanomaterial-assisted CRISPR gene-engineering - A hallmark for triple-negative breast cancer therapeutics advancement.Materials today. Bio · 2022Review
- Current updates of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing and targeting within tumor cells: an innovative strategy of cancer management.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2022Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 system in breast cancer therapy: advancement, limitations and future scope.Cancer cell international · 2022Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing: a new approach for overcoming drug resistance in cancer.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2022Review
- Strategies to overcome the main challenges of the use of CRISPR/Cas9 as a replacement for cancer therapy.Molecular cancer · 2022Review
- An avian embryo patient-derived xenograft model for preclinical studies of human breast cancers.iScience · 2021Article
- Calcium carbonate nanoparticles stimulate cancer cell reprogramming to suppress tumor growth and invasion in an organ-on-a-chip system.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- PARP1-Inhibition Sensitizes Cervical Cancer Cell Lines for Chemoradiation and Thermoradiation.Cancers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
For patients carrying
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.