Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31988973›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2020

Interplay Between Patient Colonization and Environmental Contamination With Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci and Their Association With Patient Health Outcomes in Postacute Care.

Marco Cassone, Ziwei Zhu, Julia Mantey, Kristen E Gibson, Mary B Perri, Marcus J Zervos, Evan S Snitkin, Betsy Foxman, Lona Mody

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marco CassoneDivision of Geriatrics and Palliative Care Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ziwei ZhuUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Julia ManteyDivision of Geriatrics and Palliative Care Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Kristen E GibsonDivision of Geriatrics and Palliative Care Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Mary B PerriHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Marcus J ZervosHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Evan S SnitkinDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Betsy FoxmanUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6682-238X
Lona ModyDivision of Geriatrics and Palliative Care Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Research Education CoreP30AG024824 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Neil Alexander · 2004 to 2026
$29.2M
Pathway from Functional Disability to Antimicrobial Resistance in Nursing HomesR01AG041780 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MODY, LONA · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Preventing Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance in the Aging Population: Translational Research and Training ProgramK24AG050685 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lona Mody · 2015 to 2026
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG050685NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024824NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical utility of patient and environmental surveillance screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in the postacute care setting has not been definitively clarified. We assessed the longitudinal relationship between patient colonization and room contamination, and we established their association with unfavorable health outcomes.

methodsFour hundred sixty-three postacute care patients were followed longitudinally from enrollment to discharge for up to 6 months. Multiple body and environmental sites were sampled at regular intervals to establish correlation between environmental contamination and patient colonization and with longer than expected stay, unplanned hospitalization, and infections adjusting for sex, age, race, Charlson's comorbidity index, and physical self-maintenance score.

resultsNew VRE acquisition was more likely in patients residing in contaminated rooms (multivariable odds ratio [OR] = 3.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.98-7.11) and vice versa (OR = 3.99; 95% CI, 2.16-7.51). New acquisition and new contamination were associated with increased length of stay (OR = 4.36, 95% CI = 1.86-10.2 and OR = 4.61, 95% CI = 1.92-11.0, respectively) and hospitalization (OR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.39-4.22 and OR = 2.80, 95% CI = 1.52-5.12). New-onset infections were more common with higher VRE burdens (15% in the absence of VRE, 20% when after VRE isolation only on the patient or only in the room, and 29% after VRE isolation in both the patient and the room).

conclusionsRoom contamination with VRE is a risk factor for patient colonization, and both are associated with future adverse health outcomes in our postacute care patients. Further research is warranted to establish whether VRE screening may contribute to better understanding of risk assessment and adverse outcome prevention in postacute care.

Indexed as

contaminationEnterococcushealth outcomenursing homepostacute

Identifiers

PMID31988973
PMCPMC6976341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.