Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31988946›Full record

ReviewBiomedicine hub

Ensuring Consistent European-Wide Urological Care by the Use of Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines: Can We Do Better.

Emma Jane Smith, Steven MacLennan, Anders Bjartell, Alberto Briganti, Thomas Knoll, Tillmann Loch, Maria J Ribal, Richard Sylvester, Hein Van Poppel, James N'Dow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicine hub. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emma Jane SmithEAU Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Steven MacLennanAcademic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Anders BjartellDepartment of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Alberto BrigantiDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Thomas KnollDepartment of Urology, Sindelfingen-Böblingen Medical Center, University of Tübingen, Sindelfingen.
Tillmann LochDepartment of Urology, Diakonissenkrankenhaus Flensburg, University Teaching Hospital of Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Flensburg, Germany.
Maria J RibalDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Richard SylvesterEAU Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Hein Van PoppelDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals of KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
James N'DowAcademic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Association of Urology (EAU) annually updates 21 clinical practice guidelines in which summaries of the evidence base and best practice recommendations are made. The methodology applied to achieve this and integrate stakeholder opinion is continuously improving. However, there is evidence to suggest wide variation in clinical practice indicating that many patients receive suboptimal and heterogeneous care. Studies from certain countries suggest that 2 out of 5 patients do not receive care according to the current scientific evidence, and in 1 out of 4 cases the care provided is potentially harmful. Clearly, the harmonisation of care in alignment with evidence-based best practice recommendations is something to strive for. Development of robust methods to disseminate and implement guideline recommendations and measure their impact is an objective the EAU is committed to improving. An important strategy for achieving harmonisation in urological care across Europe is to ensure the availability of high-quality clinical practice guidelines and to actively promote their implementation by clinicians and healthcare providers.

Indexed as

Clinical practice guidelinesImpact assessmentStakeholder involvementUrology

Identifiers

PMID31988946
PMCPMC6945914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.