Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31988715›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Minimum sample sizes for invasion genomics: Empirical investigation in an invasive whitefly.

Wan-Mei Qu, Ni Liang, Zi-Ku Wu, You-Gang Zhao, Dong Chu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The hindgut microbiota of coconut rhinoceros beetles (Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic Insights into High-Altitude Adaptation: A Comparative Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Evidence Reveals the Sympatric Distribution ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wan-Mei QuKey Lab of Integrated Crop Pest Management of Shandong Province College of Plant Health and Medicine Qingdao Agricultural University Qingdao China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5320-3245
Ni LiangKey Lab of Integrated Crop Pest Management of Shandong Province College of Plant Health and Medicine Qingdao Agricultural University Qingdao China.
Zi-Ku WuScience and Information College Qingdao Agricultural University Qingdao China.
You-Gang ZhaoScience and Information College Qingdao Agricultural University Qingdao China.
Dong ChuKey Lab of Integrated Crop Pest Management of Shandong Province College of Plant Health and Medicine Qingdao Agricultural University Qingdao China.
Qingdao Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of population genetics provides insights into the evolutionary processes, among which the sample size choice is per se a crucial issue in the analysis. Genome-wide high-throughput techniques based on RADseq have been increasingly used in studies on the population genomics of invasive species. However, there is little information available regarding optimal sample sizes for analyzing population genomics of invasive species. In this study, we first use type IIB endonucleases restriction site-associated DNA (2b-RAD) to mine thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for native and introduced populations in Q1 clade (SPB and 17JN) and Q2 clade (ISQ and UAS0601) of the whitefly,

Indexed as

2b‐RADempirical studyinvasive speciespopulation genomics

Identifiers

PMID31988715
PMCPMC6972819
OpenAlexW2978194485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.