Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31988656›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2020

User participation and shared decision-making in adolescent mental healthcare: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.

Stig Bjønness, Petter Viksveen, Jan Olav Johannessen, Marianne Storm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Barriers to Mental Health Support and Recommendations for Improvement From the Perspectives of LGBTQ+ Youth.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Strengthening mental health research outcomes through genuine partnerships with young people with lived or living experience: A pilot evaluation study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Parents' perspectives on user participation and shared decision-making in adolescents' inpatient mental healthcare.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Improving Customisation in Clinical Pathways by Using a Modular Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. I'm not a diagnosis: Adolescents' perspectives on user participation and shared decision-making in mental healthcare.Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stig Bjønness1Centre for Resilience in Healthcare (SHARE), Department for Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7220-1010
Petter Viksveen1Centre for Resilience in Healthcare (SHARE), Department for Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Jan Olav Johannessen2Department of Psychiatry, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Marianne Storm3Department for Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost mental health problems occur in adolescence. There is increasing recognition of user participation and shared decision-making in adolescents' mental healthcare. However, research in this field of clinical practice is still sparse. The objective of this study was to explore healthcare professionals' perspectives on user participation, and opportunities for shared decision-making in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) inpatient units.

methodsHealthcare professionals at CAMHS inpatient units participated in three focus group interviews. Fifteen participants with experience with user participation and shared decision-making were recruited from five hospitals in Norway.

resultsFive themes emerged: (1) involvement before admission; (2) sufficient time to feel safe; (3) individualized therapy; (4) access to meetings where decisions are made; and (5) changing professionals' attitudes and practices.

conclusionUser participation and shared decision-making require changes in workplace culture, and routines that allow for individualized mental health services that are adapted to adolescents' needs. This calls for a flexible approach that challenges clinical pathways and short-stay hospital policies. The results of this study may inform further work on strengthening user participation and the implementation of shared decision-making.

Indexed as

AdolescentsInpatientMental healthPerson-centered carePsychiatryShared decision-makingUser involvementUser participationYouth

Identifiers

PMID31988656
PMCPMC6969458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.