ReviewEvolutionary applications2020
275 years of forestry meets genomics in
Review in Evolutionary applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- When South Meets North: A Joint Contact Zone Coinciding With Environmental Gradients in Three Boreal Tree Species.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Adaptive Potential and Genomic Vulnerability of Keystone Forest Tree Species to Climate Change: A Case Study in Scots Pine.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- A clear climatic signal of precipitation and temperature in growth of Scots pine young trees in habitats homogenous in relief, soil and access to light.Botanical studies · 2025Article
- Comparative metagenomics of wild and cultivatedCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Resilience of genetic diversity in forest trees over the Quaternary.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Within- and between-population comparisons suggest independently acting selection maintaining parallel clines in Scots pine (Evolution letters · 2024Article
- Stronger genetic differentiation among within-population genetic groups than among populations in Scots pine provides new insights into within-population genetic structuring.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Molecular characterisation of Pinus sylvestris (L.) in Ireland at the western limit of the species distribution.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Organ-Specific Profiling of Douglas Fir (Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Strong Purifying Selection in Haploid Tissue-Specific Genes of Scots Pine Supports the Masking Theory.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Ecological and evolutionary drivers of phenotypic and genetic variation in the European crabapple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill.], a wild relative of the cultivated apple.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- The increasing threat to European forests from the invasive foliar pine pathogen,Forest ecology and management · 2023Article
- Taming the massive genome of Scots pine with PiSy50k, a new genotyping array for conifer research.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022Article
- Analysis of Transcriptome and Terpene Constituents of Scots Pine Genotypes Inherently Resistant or Susceptible toFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Phytotoxicity of short-term exposure to excess zinc or copper in Scots pine seedlings in relation to growth, water status, nutrient balance, and antioxidative activity.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Article
- Divergent patterns between phenotypic and genetic variation in Scots pine.Plant communications · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.