Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31988592›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2020

Idarubicin

Gaël Stéphane Roth, Yann Teyssier, Mélodie Abousalihac, Arnaud Seigneurin, Julien Ghelfi, Christian Sengel, Thomas Decaens

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gaël Stéphane RothClinique Universitaire d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie et Oncologie Digestive, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble 38043, France.
Yann TeyssierFaculté de Médicine, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Domaine de la Merci, La Tronche 38700, France.
Mélodie AbousalihacClinique Universitaire d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie et Oncologie Digestive, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble 38043, France.
Arnaud SeigneurinFaculté de Médicine, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Domaine de la Merci, La Tronche 38700, France.
Julien GhelfiClinique Universitaire de Radiologie et Imagerie Médicale, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble 38043, France.
Christian SengelClinique Universitaire de Radiologie et Imagerie Médicale, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble 38043, France.
Thomas DecaensClinique Universitaire d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie et Oncologie Digestive, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble 38043, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the second cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the best treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Doxorubicin is the most commonly used drug despite a low level of evidence.

aimTo compare the objective response rate of idarubicin-based TACE (Ida-TACE) against doxorubicin-based TACE (Dox-TACE) in intermediate stage HCC.

methodsBetween January 2012 and December 2014, all patients treated with TACE at our academic hospital were screened. Inclusion criteria were patients with Child-Pugh score A or B, a performance status below or equal to 1, and no prior TACE. Either lipiodol TACE or drug-eluting beads TACE could be performed with 10 mg of idarubicin or 50 mg of doxorubicin. Each patient treated with idarubicin was matched with two doxorubicin-treated patients. The TACE response was assessed by independent radiologists according to the mRECIST criteria.

resultsSixty patients were treated with doxorubicin and thirty with idarubicin. There were 93% and 87% of cirrhotic patients and 87% and 70% of Child-Pugh A in the doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. The median number of HCC per patient was two in both groups with 31% and 26% of single nodules in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Objective response rate after first TACE was 76.7% and 73.3% (

conclusionIda-TACE and Dox-TACE showed comparable results in terms of efficacy and safety. Ida-TACE may represent an interesting alternative to Dox-TACE in the management of patients with intermediate stage HCC.

Indexed as

AgedAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticDoxorubicinFemaleHumansIdarubicinLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibiotics, AntineoplasticDoxorubicinIdarubicinDoxorubicinHepatocellular carcinomaIdarubicinIntermediate stageTransarterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID31988592
PMCPMC6969879
OpenAlexW2999874135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.