Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31988586›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2020

Plasma exchange in patients with acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure: A systematic review.

Eunice Xiang-Xuan Tan, Min-Xian Wang, Junxiong Pang, Guan-Huei Lee

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Plasma exchange improves survival in acute liver failure - An updated systematic review and meta-analysis focussed on comparing within single etiology.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Management of acute liver failure-an updated literature review.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Non-bioartificial liver support system in the treatment of pediatric acute liver failure.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Analysis of the prognosis and survival of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eunice Xiang-Xuan TanNational University Health System, Singapore 119228, Singapore.
Min-Xian WangCentre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore.
Junxiong PangCentre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore.
Guan-Huei LeeNational University Health System, Singapore 119228, Singapore.
National University Health System · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver (ACLF) carry high short-term mortality rate, and may result from a wide variety of causes. Plasma exchange has been shown in a randomized control trial to improve survival in ALF especially in patients who did not receive a liver transplant. Other cohort studies demonstrated potential improvement in survival in patients with ACLF.

aimTo assess utility of plasma exchange in liver failure and its effect on mortality in patients who do not undergo liver transplantation.

methodsDatabases MEDLINE

resultsThree hundred twenty four records were reviewed, of which 62 studies were found to be duplicates. Of the 262 records screened, 211 studies were excluded. Fifty-one articles were assessed for eligibility, for which 7 were excluded. Twenty-nine studies were included for ALF only, and 9 studies for ACLF only. Six studies included both ALF and ACLF patients. A total of 44 publications were included. Of the included publications, 2 were randomized controlled trials, 14 cohort studies, 12 case series, 16 case reports. All of three ALF studies which looked at survival rate or survival days reported improvement in outcome with plasma exchange. In two out of four studies where plasma exchange-based liver support systems were compared to standard medical treatment (SMT) for ACLF, a biochemical improvement was seen. Survival in the non-transplanted patients was improved in all four studies in patients with ACLF comparing plasma exchange

conclusionThe level of evidence for use of high volume plasma exchange in selected ALF cases is high. Plasma exchange in ACLF improves survival at 30-and 90-d in non-transplanted patients. Further well-designed randomized control trials will need to be carried out to ascertain the optimal duration and amount of plasma exchange required and assess if the use of high volume plasma exchange can be extrapolated to patients with ACLF.

Indexed as

Acute-On-Chronic Liver FailureHospital MortalityHumansLiver Failure, AcutePlasma ExchangeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvival RateTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAcute liver failureAcute-on-chronic liver failureLiver failurePlasma exchangePlasmapheresis

Identifiers

PMID31988586
PMCPMC6962432
OpenAlexW2998795088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.