Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31988481›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of obesity (2005)2020

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of The Daily Mile on childhood weight outcomes and wellbeing: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Katie Breheny, Sandra Passmore, Peymane Adab, James Martin, Karla Hemming, Emma R Lancashire, Emma Frew

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of obesity (2005), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05862506 (Effects of the Daily Mile Program on Health - Related Physical Fitness and Sleep Quality in Overweight/Obese Schoolchildren), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05862506 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of the Daily Mile Program on Health - Related Physical Fitness and Sleep Quality in Overweight/Obese Schoolchildren: a Non- Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnidades Tecnológicas de SantanderRan2023 to 2023Enrolled70ConditionsOverweight Adolescents, Obesity, AdolescentArmsDaily Mile
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 5 to 11 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Willingness to pay for measures to increase use of active school transport.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katie Breheny *Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Sandra Passmore *Services for Education, Birmingham, B7 4AX, UK.
Peymane AdabInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. p.adab@bham.ac.uk.
James MartinInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Karla HemmingInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Emma R LancashireInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Emma FrewInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. e.frew@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5462-1158

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2015-08-013Department of Health SRF-2017-10-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Daily Mile is designed to increase physical activity levels with children running or walking around school grounds for 15-min daily. It has been adopted by schools worldwide and endorsed as a solution to tackle obesity, despite no robust evidence of its benefits. We conducted a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine its clinical and cost-effectiveness.

methodsForty schools were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the Daily Mile intervention or control group in which only the usual school health and wellbeing activities were implemented. The primary outcome was BMI z-score (BMIz) at 12 months follow-up from baseline, with planned subgroup analysis to examine differential effects. Primary economic analysis outcome was incremental cost per Quality-Adjusted-Life-Year (QALY) gained.

resultsUsing a constrained randomisation approach, balanced on school size, baseline BMIz and proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals, 20 schools were allocated to intervention (n = 1,153 participants) and 20 to control (n = 1,127); 3 schools withdrew (2 intervention, 1 control). At 12 months, BMIz data were available for 18 intervention schools (n = 850) and 19 control schools (n = 820 participants). Using intention-to-treat analysis the adjusted mean difference (MD) in BMIz (intervention - control) was -0.036 (95% CI: -0.085 to 0.013, p = 0.146). Pre-specified subgroup analysis showed a significant interaction with sex (p = 0.001) suggesting a moderate size benefit of The Daily Mile in girls (MD -0.097, 95% CI -0.156 to -0.037). This was consistent with the exploratory economic results that showed The Daily Mile to be highly cost-effective in girls (£2,492 per QALY), but not in boys, and overall to have a 76% chance of cost-effectiveness for the whole sample, at the commonly applied UK threshold of £20,000 per QALY.

conclusionsOverall the Daily Mile had a small but non-significant effect on BMIz, however, it had a greater effect in girls suggesting that it might be considered as a cost-effective component of a system-wide approach to childhood obesity prevention.

Indexed as

Health PromotionBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleQuality-Adjusted Life YearsWalking

Identifiers

PMID31988481
PMCPMC7101281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.