ArticleScientific reports2020
Prognosis and risk factors in older patients with lung cancer and pulmonary embolism: a propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and risk factors of VTE in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Prevalence and clinical characteristics of venous thromboembolism in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Trends in pulmonary embolism mortality among older adults with lung cancer in the united States, 1999-2020.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Impact of metabolically healthy and metabolically unhealthy obesity on cardiac arrest and mortality in pulmonary embolism hospitalizations in elderly patients with cancer.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2026Article
- Incidence of pulmonary embolism and its risk factors in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- A predictive model for hospital death in cancer patients with acute pulmonary embolism using XGBoost machine learning and SHAP interpretation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Research progress on the association between lung cancer and pulmonary embolism.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Application of IMB model in preventing venous thromboembolism in elderly lung cancer patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Characteristics and risk factors for advanced lung cancer with pulmonary embolism: A cross-sectional, case-control study.The clinical respiratory journal · 2023Article
- Stratification of Risk Factors of Lung Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism and Determining the Critical Point for Preemptive Intervention: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2023Review
- Article
- Cardiogenic shock among cancer patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Are cardiovascular comorbidities always associated with a worse prognosis in patients with lung cancer?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- The Diagnostic Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Venous Thromboembolism in Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study.Mediators of inflammation · 2022Article
- Association of Venous Thromboembolism and Early Mortality in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- POLE: Development and Validation of a Pulmonary Embolism Prediction Model in Lung Cancer.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
- Derivation and External Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Older patients, especially those with malignancy, may have an increased risk of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, few studies have evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of older patients. We evaluated the clinical characteristics, prognosis, and risk factors in older patients with lung cancer complicated with PE. This was a single-center, prospective cohort study. Older patients (≥65 years) with lung cancer admitted in Beijing Hospital from January 2006 to December 2016 were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of PE using propensity score matching (PSM). After PSM, one hundred and six patients (53 per group) with an average age of (77.3 ± 10.9) years were enrolled. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology in patients with PE (52.8%, n = 28), and most lung cancer patients were in stages III and IV (59.4%, n = 63). Patients with PE were stratified to low risk (52.8%, n = 28), intermediate-low risk (24.5%, n = 13), intermediate-high risk (15.1%, n = 8), high-risk (7.5%, n = 4) subgroups. Most PE patients presented with dyspnea (75.5%), and the majority of patients (86.8%, n = 46) developed PE within 3 months after the diagnosis of cancer. The median follow-up time was 23.7 months (12.0-62.0 months), and 7 patients (6.6%) were lost to follow-up. During the follow-up period, 92 patients (86.8%) died, including 8 cases (8.7%) of PE-related death, 73 (79.3%) of tumor death, and 11 (11.9%) of unknown cause. There were significant differences in all-cause mortality (94.3% vs. 83.0%) and PE-related mortality (15.1% vs. 0) between the PE and control groups, but the rate of tumor-related mortality (75.5% vs. 66.0%) was comparable between the groups. Among the 92 patients who died, the mortality rates at 3, 6, 12, and > 12 months after tumor diagnosis were 33.0% (33/106), 57.5% (61/106), 78.3% (83/106), and 89.6% (95/106), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the median overall survival time was significantly different between the PE and the control groups (4.3 vs. 9.2 months, P = 0.0015). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥ 77 years (OR = 2.58, 95%CI: 1.66-4.01), clinical stage III-IV (OR = 2.21, 95%CI: 1.03-4.74), adenocarcinoma (OR = 3.24, 95%CI: 1.75-6.00), high D-dimer (≥600 mg/L) (OR = 2.73, 95%CI: 1.25-5.96), and low partial pressure of oxygen (PaO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.