Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31988385›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2020

Towards a comprehensive catalogue of validated and target-linked human enhancers.

Molly Gasperini, Jacob M Tome, Jay Shendure

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 231 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
231citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

231 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A putativebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. UnlockingNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. NovelbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. RiboScreenBiomedicines · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Cardiac epigenome in heart development and disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Enhancer hubs govern chromatin topology and Th17 cell identity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Molly GasperiniDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jacob M TomeDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jay ShendureDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. shendure@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-1865

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN GENOMIC SCIENCEST32HG000035 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Bruce Colston Trapnell · 1995 to 2026
$24.2M
Massively parallel reporter assays and genome editing of ENCODE predicted regulatory elementsUM1HG009408 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AHITUV, NADAV, SHENDURE, JAY ASHOK · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000035NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG009408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human gene catalogue is essentially complete, but we lack an equivalently vetted inventory of bona fide human enhancers. Hundreds of thousands of candidate enhancers have been nominated via biochemical annotations; however, only a handful of these have been validated and confidently linked to their target genes. Here we review emerging technologies for discovering, characterizing and validating human enhancers at scale. We furthermore propose a new framework for operationally defining enhancers that accommodates the heterogeneous and complementary results that are emerging from reporter assays, biochemical measurements and CRISPR screens.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsGenome, HumanHumans

Identifiers

PMID31988385
PMCPMC7845138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.