Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31988305›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Differences in signal contrast and camouflage among different colour variations of a stomatopod crustacean, Neogonodactylus oerstedii.

Amanda M Franklin, Justin Marshall, Adina D Feinstein, Michael J Bok, Anya D Byrd, Sara M Lewis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Colour vision in stomatopod crustaceans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Crustacean conundrums: a review of opsin diversity and evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Color variation in signal crayfishCurrent zoology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Amanda M FranklinBiology Department, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA. am7franklin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-8344
Justin MarshallSensory Neurobiology Group, Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.
Adina D FeinsteinBiology Department, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9464-8101
Michael J BokSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.
Anya D ByrdDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA.
Sara M LewisBiology Department, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Tufts University · USThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal colouration is often a trade-off between background matching for camouflage from predators, and conspicuousness for communication with con- or heterospecifics. Stomatopods are marine crustaceans known to use colour signals during courtship and contests, while their overall body colouration may provide camouflage. However, we have little understanding of how stomatopods perceive these signals in their environment or whether overall body coloration does provide camouflage from predators. Neogonodactylus oerstedii assess meral spot colour during contests, and meral spot colour varies depending on local habitat. By calculating quantum catch for N. oerstedii's 12 photoreceptors associated with chromatic vision, we found that variation in meral spot total reflectance does not function to increase signal contrast in the local habitat. Neogonodactylus oerstedii also show between-habitat variation in dorsal body colouration. We used visual models to predict a trichromatic fish predator's perception of these colour variations. Our results suggest that sandy and green stomatopods are camouflaged from a typical fish predator in rubble fields and seagrass beds, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate signal contrast and camouflage in a stomatopod. These results provide new insight into the function and evolution of colouration in a species with a complex visual system.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological MimicryColor PerceptionCrustaceaDecapodaEvolution, MolecularEyeGenetic VariationPhotoreceptor CellsPhylogenyPigmentationPigments, BiologicalPigments, Biological

Identifiers

PMID31988305
PMCPMC6985165
OpenAlexW3000792954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.