Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31988145›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2020

Knowledge of Potential Harms and Benefits of Tamoxifen among Women Considering Breast Cancer Preventive Therapy.

Rachael Jane Thorneloe, Louise Hazel Hall, Fiona Mary Walter, Lucy Side, Kelly Elizabeth Lloyd, Samuel George Smith, ENGAGE Investigators

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Targeting Oestrogen Receptor Signalling in Breast Cancer Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rachael Jane ThorneloeLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Louise Hazel HallLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9032-4540
Fiona Mary WalterDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7191-6476
Lucy SideWessex Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Kelly Elizabeth LloydLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Samuel George Smith
ENGAGE Investigators
University of Leeds · GBPrincess Anne Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17965Cancer Research UK A17965Cancer Research UK C42785/A17965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tamoxifen reduces breast cancer incidence in women at increased risk, but may cause side effects. We examined women's knowledge of tamoxifen's potential harms and benefits, and the extent to which knowledge reflects subjective judgments of awareness and decision quality. After a hospital appointment, 408 (55.7%) women at increased risk of breast cancer completed a survey assessing objective knowledge about the potential benefit (risk reduction) and harms (endometrial cancer, thromboembolic events, and menopausal side effects) of tamoxifen, and subjective tamoxifen knowledge and decisional quality. Two hundred fifty-eight (63.2%) completed a 3-month follow-up survey. Sixteen percent (15.7%) of participants recognized the potential benefit and three major harms of using tamoxifen. These women were more likely to have degree-level education [vs. below degree level; OR, 2.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11-4.55] and good numeracy (vs. poor numeracy; OR, 5.91; 95% CI, 1.33-26.19). Tamoxifen uptake was higher in women who recognized all harms and benefits (vs. not recognizing; OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 0.94-6.54). Sixty-six percent (65.8%) of tamoxifen users were unaware of its potential benefit and harms. Most (87.1%) women reported feeling informed about tamoxifen, and subjective decisional quality was high [Mean (SD), 17.03 (1.87), out of 18]. Knowledge regarding the potential harms and benefit of tamoxifen is low in women considering prevention therapy, and they may need additional support to make informed decisions about tamoxifen preventive therapy.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID31988145
PMCPMC7611305
OpenAlexW3000328521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.