Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31987983›Full record

ArticleProgress in retinal and eye research2020

Ocular blood flow as a clinical observation: Value, limitations and data analysis.

Alon Harris, Giovanna Guidoboni, Brent Siesky, Sunu Mathew, Alice C Verticchio Vercellin, Lucas Rowe, Julia Arciero

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in retinal and eye research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. DELP Treatment on Vision and Retinal Microcirculation in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Report of Five Cases and Literature Review.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Comparing Interface Conditions for a 3D-0D Multiscale Interface Coupling With Applications in Tissue Perfusion.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alon HarrisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: alon.harris@mssm.edu.
Giovanna GuidoboniUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Brent SieskyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Sunu MathewIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Alice C Verticchio VercellinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA; University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; IRCCS - Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.
Lucas RoweIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Julia ArcieroIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University School of MedicineMount Sinai Hospital · USUniversity of Indianapolis · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

Integration of clinical measures and theoretical modeling to quantify sectorial specific changes in ocular structure, function, and hemodynamicsR01EY030851 · NEI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI ARCIERO, JULIA, HARRIS, ALON · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations in ocular blood flow have been identified as important risk factors for the onset and progression of numerous diseases of the eye. In particular, several population-based and longitudinal-based studies have provided compelling evidence of hemodynamic biomarkers as independent risk factors for ocular disease throughout several different geographic regions. Despite this evidence, the relative contribution of blood flow to ocular physiology and pathology in synergy with other risk factors and comorbidities (e.g., age, gender, race, diabetes and hypertension) remains uncertain. There is currently no gold standard for assessing all relevant vascular beds in the eye, and the heterogeneous vascular biomarkers derived from multiple ocular imaging technologies are non-interchangeable and difficult to interpret as a whole. As a result of these disease complexities and imaging limitations, standard statistical methods often yield inconsistent results across studies and are unable to quantify or explain a patient's overall risk for ocular disease. Combining mathematical modeling with artificial intelligence holds great promise for advancing data analysis in ophthalmology and enabling individualized risk assessment from diverse, multi-input clinical and demographic biomarkers. Mechanism-driven mathematical modeling makes virtual laboratories available to investigate pathogenic mechanisms, advance diagnostic ability and improve disease management. Artificial intelligence provides a novel method for utilizing a vast amount of data from a wide range of patient types to diagnose and monitor ocular disease. This article reviews the state of the art and major unanswered questions related to ocular vascular anatomy and physiology, ocular imaging techniques, clinical findings in glaucoma and other eye diseases, and mechanistic modeling predictions, while laying a path for integrating clinical observations with mathematical models and artificial intelligence. Viable alternatives for integrated data analysis are proposed that aim to overcome the limitations of standard statistical approaches and enable individually tailored precision medicine in ophthalmology.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceGlaucomaMathematical modelsOcular blood flowVascular risk factors

Identifiers

PMID31987983
PMCPMC8908549
OpenAlexW3001197573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.