Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31987960›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2020

Microbial Diversity and Composition Is Associated with Patient-Reported Toxicity during Chemoradiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer.

Aparna Mitra, Greyson Willis Grossman Biegert, Andrea Y Delgado, Tatiana V Karpinets, Travis N Solley, Melissa P Mezzari, Kyoko Yoshida-Court, Joe F Petrosino, Megan D Mikkelson, Lilie Lin and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exploring the links among inflammation and gut microbiome with psychoneurological symptoms and gastrointestinal toxicities in gynecologic cancers: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. A phase II clinical trial ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [Advances in Multi-omics Analysis of Cervical Cancer].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aparna MitraDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Greyson Willis Grossman BiegertDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Andrea Y DelgadoDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Tatiana V KarpinetsDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Travis N SolleyDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Melissa P MezzariAlkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Kyoko Yoshida-CourtDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Joe F PetrosinoAlkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Megan D MikkelsonDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Lilie LinDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Patricia EifelDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jianhua ZhangDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Lois M RamondettaDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Anuja JhingranDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Travis T SimsDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Kathleen SchmelerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Pablo OkhuysenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Lauren E ColbertDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: lcolbert@mdanderson.org.
Ann H KloppDivision of Radiation Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Training of Academic Gynecologic OncologistsT32CA101642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIL K SOOD, Kathleen Schmeler · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA101642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients receiving pelvic radiation for cervical cancer experience high rates of acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. The association of changes in the gut microbiome with bowel toxicity from radiation is not well characterized. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-five patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) underwent longitudinal sampling (baseline and weeks 1, 3, and 5) of the gut microbiome and prospective assessment of patient-reported GI toxicity. DNA was isolated from stool obtained at rectal examination and analyzed with 16S rRNA sequencing. GI toxicity was assessed with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite instrument to evaluate frequency, urgency, and discomfort associated with bowel function. Shannon diversity index was used to characterize alpha (within sample) diversity. Weighted UniFrac principle coordinates analysis was used to compare beta (between sample) diversity between samples using permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Linear discriminant analysis effect size highlighted microbial features that best distinguish categorized patient samples.

resultsGut microbiome diversity continuously decreased over the course of CRT, with the largest decrease at week 5. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite bowel function scores also declined over the course of treatment, reflecting increased symptom burden. At all individual time points, higher diversity of the gut microbiome was linearly correlated with better patient-reported GI function, but baseline diversity was not predictive of eventual outcome. Patients with high toxicity demonstrated different compositional changes during CRT in addition to compositional differences in Clostridia species.

conclusionsOver time, increased radiation toxicity is associated with decreased gut microbiome diversity. Baseline diversity is not predictive of end-of-treatment bowel toxicity, but composition may identify patients at risk for developing high toxicity.

Indexed as

SafetyAdultAgedBiodiversityChemoradiotherapyCohort StudiesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractHumansMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31987960
PMCPMC7932475
OpenAlexW3002865023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.