Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31987958›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2020

Diminishing Returns From Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Ivan R Vogelius, Søren M Bentzen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05705921 (Standard Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy vs. Ultra-hypofractionated Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in Prostate Cancer, Hypo-FLAME 3.0), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05705921 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Standard Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy vs. Ultra-hypofractionated Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in Prostate Cancer, Hypo-FLAME 3.0

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteRan2023 to 2032Enrolled484ConditionsProstate CancerArmsRadiotherapy standard, Radiotherapy Hypo-FLAME
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. SABR for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Multilevel MRI-Based Dose Escalation Trial.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ivan R VogeliusDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: ivan.richter.vogelius@regionh.dk.
Søren M BentzenDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND GREENEBAUM CANCER CENTERSUPPORT GRANTP30CA134274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Vu H. Duong · 2008 to 2026
$51.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA134274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMore than a decade of randomized controlled trials in prostate cancer has established a positive radiation dose response at moderate doses and a consistently low α/β ratio in the linear quadratic model for moderate hypofractionation. The recently published large randomized trial of ultrahypofractionated prostate cancer radiation therapy adds substantially to our current knowledge of dose response and fractionation sensitivity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Randomized trials of dose escalation and hypofractionation of radiation therapy were meta-analyzed to yield the overall best estimate of the α/β ratio. Additionally, a putative saturation of dose effect previously reported at approximately 80 Gy EQD2 was investigated by mapping the relative effectiveness assessed at 5 years onto a single reference dose-response curve.

resultsMeta-analysis of 14 randomized trials including 13,384 patients yielded a best estimate of α/β = 1.6 Gy (95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.0 Gy) but with highly significant heterogeneity (I

conclusionsBiochemical control data from randomized controlled trials of dose-per-fraction escalation in prostate cancer radiation therapy are inconsistent with the presence of a constant fractionation sensitivity in the linear-quadratic model and/or a monotonic dose response for biochemical control beyond 80 Gy equivalent dose. These observations have a potential effect on the optimal doses in future trials and the interpretation of ongoing trials of ultrahypofractionation.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicRadiation Dose HypofractionationHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31987958
PMCPMC9427116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.