ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2020
Long-Term Follow-Up of Normal Tension Glaucoma Patients With TBK1 Gene Mutations in One Large Pedigree.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoplasmic reticulum stress: molecular mechanism and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo characterize features of glaucoma associated with a TANK binding kinase 1 (TBK1) gene duplication, which is among the most common molecularly defined causes of normal tension glaucoma (NTG).
designRetrospective observational case series.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective case series, by reviewing medical records of 7 members of a pedigree with NTG caused by TBK1 gene duplications. Clinical features of these patients at diagnosis, throughout management, and at latest follow-up were identified, including age, intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), optic nerve head appearance, and mean deviation (MD) assessed with Humphrey visual field (HVF) testing protocols.
resultsAt initial diagnosis, the mean age was 35 ± 7 years, IOP was 16 ± 2.1 mm Hg, cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio was 0.9 ± 0.08, and MD assessed via HVF 30-2 and/or 24-2 testing protocols was -9.0 ± 8.9 (range: -1.8 to -27) dB in the 14 study eyes. At initial diagnosis, 4 of 14 eyes (28%) had no visual field defect, 4 (28%) had early visual field defects, and 6 (43%) had severe visual field defects. Patients had a mean follow-up of 21.5 ± 9.0 years and experienced an average reduction of IOP by 28%. Four of 12 eyes (33%) had stable visual fields throughout follow-up, while 8 eyes (67%) had slow-to-moderate progression. The 30-2 and/or 24-2 HVF tests had an average change in MD of -0.53 ± 0.26 dB/year. No eyes had rapid progression with an MD >1.0 dB/year. At final follow-up, the mean IOP was 11.5 ± 2.9, and C/D ratio was 0.94 ± 0.4. At final follow-up, 3 of 14 eyes (21%) had early visual field defects, 4 (29%) had moderate visual field defects, and 7 (50%) had severe visual field defects. Six of 14 eyes (43%) met criteria for legal blindness.
conclusionsWe provide the first report of the clinical features and long-term clinical course in a family of NTG patients with TBK1 gene duplications. TBK1-associated glaucoma exhibits classic features of NTG. Patients present with severe disease at a relatively early age and most (67%) have slow-to-moderate progression of their visual field defects. The rate of visual field change appears correlated with the magnitude of IOP, suggesting that it may be advantageous to set extremely low IOP targets for some patients with TBK1-associated glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.