ArticleApplied ergonomics2020
SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.
Article in Applied ergonomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 206 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
206 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Safety Climate and Safety Behavior and Outcomes: A Comprehensive Systematic Review in Healthcare From the Perspective of Staff and Patients.Human factors · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Built Environment Interventions to Improve Patient and Staff Outcomes in Emergency Department Mental and Behavioral Healthcare.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Parent understanding and satisfaction with NICU discharge for infants with medical complexity: a scoping review of discharge instruction tools.BMC pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- A patient journey map based on the experience of temporomandibular disorders patients: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing AI in Routine Medical Imaging: Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- The use of healthcare simulation to identify and address latent safety threats: a scoping review.Frontiers in health services · 2025Pooled it
- A cross-sector systematic review and synthesis of knowledge on telemedicine interventions in chronic wound management-Implications from a system perspective.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- Medication-related interventions to improve medication safety and patient outcomes on transition from adult intensive care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ quality & safety · 2022Pooled it
- Definition and conceptualization of the patient-centered care pathway, a proposed integrative framework for consensus: a Concept analysis and systematic review.BMC health services research · 2022Pooled it
- Beyond the Document: A Single-Center Qualitative Study of Survivorship Care Plan Barriers and Opportunities Across Pediatric Oncology Stakeholders.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2026Article
- Clinician Trust and Human Factors in AI-Enabled Clinical Decision Support in Acute Care: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Health System Factors in Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis: A HEADSpAcE Consortium Qualitative Study in Glasgow and Montevideo.Head & neck · 2026Article
- Wearable Electronic Monitoring of Vital Signs in Hospitalised Adults: A Nursing Focused Scoping Review of Clinical, Economic and Implementation Outcomes.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- From Prototype to Practice: Mixed Methods Study of Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality for Complex Oncology Surgical Workflows.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) into European Spanish: a multi-perspective study including peer-assessment.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Usability and Workflow Integration of a Machine Learning-Derived Neonatal Risk Predictor in Kenyan Neonatal Units: Multisite User-Centered Pilot Evaluation.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Understanding the Limits of Patient Safety Classification Systems for Health Information Technology-Related Incidents.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Latent profiles and network characteristics of perceived patient safety culture among emergency and critical care nurses: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Development of a Data-Enabled Mixed Method for Designing for Patients From a Human-Centered Design Perspective: Explorative Case Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Digital Gaze and Vicarious Trauma Among Intensive Care Unit Nurses in Alarm-Monitoring Ecologies: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) and SEIPS 2.0 models provide a framework for integrating Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) in health care quality and patient safety improvement. As care becomes increasingly distributed over space and time, the "process" component of the SEIPS model needs to evolve and represent this additional complexity. In this paper, we review different ways that the process component of the SEIPS models have been described and applied. We then propose the SEIPS 3.0 model, which expands the process component, using the concept of the patient journey to describe the spatio-temporal distribution of patients' interactions with multiple care settings over time. This new SEIPS 3.0 sociotechnical systems approach to the patient journey and patient safety poses several conceptual and methodological challenges to HFE researchers and professionals, including the need to consider multiple perspectives, issues with genuine participation, and HFE work at the boundaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.