Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31987043›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2020

FGFR3 signaling and function in triple negative breast cancer.

Nicole J Chew, Elizabeth V Nguyen, Shih-Ping Su, Karel Novy, Howard C Chan, Lan K Nguyen, Jennii Luu, Kaylene J Simpson, Rachel S Lee, Roger J Daly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Characteristics of fusion genes in breast cancer.Cancer cell international · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Breast Cancer Progression by the FGF/FGFR Axis: A Metabolic Perspective.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. SnoRNAs: The promising targets for anti-tumor therapy.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole J ChewCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Elizabeth V NguyenCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Shih-Ping SuCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Karel NovyCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Howard C ChanCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Lan K NguyenCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Jennii LuuSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Kaylene J SimpsonSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Rachel S LeeCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Roger J DalyCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia. roger.daly@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-8027
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUDiscovery Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTriple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 16% of breast cancers and represents an aggressive subtype that lacks targeted therapeutic options. In this study, mass spectrometry (MS)-based tyrosine phosphorylation profiling identified aberrant FGFR3 activation in a subset of TNBC cell lines. This kinase was therefore evaluated as a potential therapeutic target.

methodsMS-based tyrosine phosphorylation profiling was undertaken across a panel of 24 TNBC cell lines. Immunoprecipitation and Western blot were used to further characterize FGFR3 phosphorylation. Indirect immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy were used to determine FGFR3 localization. The selective FGFR1-3 inhibitor, PD173074 and siRNA knockdowns were used to characterize the functional role of FGFR3 in vitro. The TCGA and Metabric breast cancer datasets were interrogated to identify FGFR3 alterations and how they relate to breast cancer subtype and overall patient survival.

resultsHigh FGFR3 expression and phosphorylation were detected in SUM185PE cells, which harbor a FGFR3-TACC3 gene fusion. Low FGFR3 phosphorylation was detected in CAL51, MFM-223 and MDA-MB-231 cells. In SUM185PE cells, the FGFR3-TACC3 fusion protein contributed the majority of phosphorylated FGFR3, and largely localized to the cytoplasm and plasma membrane, with staining at the mitotic spindle in a small subset of cells. Knockdown of the FGFR3-TACC3 fusion and wildtype FGFR3 in SUM185PE cells decreased FRS2, AKT and ERK phosphorylation, and induced cell death. Knockdown of wildtype FGFR3 resulted in only a trend for decreased proliferation. PD173074 significantly decreased FRS2, AKT and ERK activation, and reduced SUM185PE cell proliferation. Cyclin A and pRb were also decreased in the presence of PD173074, while cleaved PARP was increased, indicating cell cycle arrest in G1 phase and apoptosis. Knockdown of FGFR3 in CAL51, MFM-223 and MDA-MB-231 cells had no significant effect on cell proliferation. Interrogation of public datasets revealed that increased FGFR3 expression in breast cancer was significantly associated with reduced overall survival, and that potentially oncogenic FGFR3 alterations (eg mutation and amplification) occur in the TNBC/basal, luminal A and luminal B subtypes, but are rare.

conclusionsThese results indicate that targeting FGFR3 may represent a therapeutic option for TNBC, but only for patients with oncogenic FGFR3 alterations, such as the FGFR3-TACC3 fusion. Video abstract.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleG1 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHumansMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsPhosphorylationReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3Signal TransductionTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3TACC3 protein, humanFibroblast growth factor receptorOncogeneReceptor tyrosine kinaseSignal transductionTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID31987043
PMCPMC6986078
OpenAlexW3005850617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.