ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Predictive Value of the Get With The Guidelines Heart Failure Risk Score in Unselected Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Dynamic association between triglyceride-glucose-body mass index and hospital mortality in critically ill patients with heart failure: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Observational
- Assessment of the Accuracy of the ADHERE Score in a Brazilian Acute Heart Failure Cohort.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Article
- Risk stratification and survival prediction in heart failure: from grades to scores.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Unsupervised machine learning to identify subphenotypes among cardiac intensive care unit patients with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- The Prognostic Accuracy of Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Score Alone and with Lactate Among Acute Symptomatic Heart Failure Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- The modified Rajan's heart failure risk score predicts all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Interpretable prediction of 3-year all-cause mortality in patients with chronic heart failure based on machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- The Wider Considerations in Closing Chronic Disease Gaps - Focus on Heart Failure and Implementation.Current cardiology reviews · 2023Review
- Evaluation of the HEFESTOS scale to predict outcomes in emergency department acute heart failure patients.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022Article
- Validation of R-hf risk score for risk stratification in ischemic heart failure patients: A prospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Mortality Prediction in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review of Existing and Artificial Intelligence Augmented Approaches.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Review
- Are Unselected Risk Scores in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Needed?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Validation of the Intermountain Risk Score and Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure Score in predicting mortality.Open heart · 2021Article
- Acute cardiovascular hospitalizations and illness severity before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Clinical cardiology · 2021Article
- Application of Extreme Learning Machine in the Survival Analysis of Chronic Heart Failure Patients With High Percentage of Censored Survival Time.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Contemporary Management of Severe Acute Kidney Injury and Refractory Cardiorenal Syndrome: JACC Council Perspectives.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2020Review
- Predictive Value of the Get With The Guidelines Heart Failure Risk Score in Unselected Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) population is no longer composed of only patients with acute coronary syndromes, and includes those with acute heart failure and multiple comorbidities. We hypothesized that the GWTG-HF (Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure) risk score that predicts inpatient mortality in hospitalized patients with heart failure would predict mortality in CICU patients. Methods and Results We retrospectively analyzed CICU patients at a tertiary care hospital from 2007 to 2015. The GWTG-HF risk score was calculated at CICU admission. As a secondary analysis, the EFFECT (Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment), OPTIMIZE-HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure), and ADHERE (Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry) risk scores were calculated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value were determined for inpatient and 1-year mortality. The GWTG-HF risk score was calculated in 9532 (95%) patients, with a median value of 40 (interquartile range, 35-47). Inpatient mortality occurred in 824 (8.6%) patients, and 2075 (21.8%) patients died by 1 year. Patients who died in hospital had a significantly higher mean GWTG-HF score (47.7 versus 40.2;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.