Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31986899›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP2020

Development and Evaluation of a Cancer Literacy Intervention to Promote Mammography Screening Among Navajo Women: A Pilot Study.

Pamela S Sinicrope, Mark C Bauer, Christi A Patten, Martha Austin-Garrison, Linda Garcia, Christine A Hughes, Martha J Bock, Paul A Decker, Kathleen J Yost, Wesley O Petersen and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela S SinicropeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology and Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8095-6966
Mark C BauerDiné College, Tsaile, AZ, USA.
Christi A PattenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology and Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Martha Austin-GarrisonDiné College, Tsaile, AZ, USA.
Linda GarciaDiné College, Tsaile, AZ, USA.
Christine A HughesDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology and Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Martha J BockDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology and Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Paul A DeckerDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Biomedical Statistics and Behavioral Health Research Program, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kathleen J YostDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Survey Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Wesley O PetersenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology and Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lydia P BukiDepartment of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Edward R GarrisonDiné College, Tsaile, AZ, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USDiné College · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Family Cancer Literacy to Promote Mammography Screening among Navajo WomenR21CA152433 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PATTEN, CHRISTI A · 2010 to 2012
$260k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA152433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDevelop and evaluate a mammography intervention that provides hope about cancer prevention and treatment.

designPilot randomized controlled trial.

settingTwo communities on the Navajo Nation.

participantsNavajo women and support persons.

interventionBoth groups received standard care: one home visit discussing mammography pros/cons and barriers. The treatment group received an intervention based on Navajo language via an additional home visit with health education materials (written and oral) in English and Navajo, including a Navajo Cancer Glossary with a new descriptive phrase for cancer. ANALYSIS: Between control and intervention conditions, we compared baseline sociodemographics; changes from baseline to 3 months on mammography completion and breast cancer literacy scores. MEASURES: (1) intervention feasibility; (2) self- and clinic-reported mammography screening completion; (3) breast cancer literacy.

resultsA total of 25 participants were randomly assigned (13 treatment, 12 control), with 7 support persons in each arm. Mean age was 53 years, 90% had a high school degree or higher, 86% spoke Navajo and English. At 3 months, 44% had a clinically verified mammogram. Mammography completion was 57% among those with a support person and 27% among those without (

conclusionsIncreases in breast cancer beliefs consistent with mammography show promise. Findings highlight a need to tailor education materials to Navajo culture/language and focus on enhancing support.

Indexed as

American Indian or Alaska NativeBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealth LiteracyFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLanguageMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot ProjectsAI/ANAmerican Indianbreast cancercancercancer literacycancer screeninghealth disparitiesinterventionmammographyNavajopreventionrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31986899
PMCPMC7571462
OpenAlexW3003590779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.