Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31986245›Full record

ReviewJournal of microbiology and biotechnology2020

Spoilage Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Brewing Industry.

Zhenbo Xu, Yuting Luo, Yuzhu Mao, Ruixin Peng, Jinxuan Chen, Thanapop Soteyome, Caiying Bai, Ling Chen, Yi Liang, Jianyu Su and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of microbiology and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Ethanolphilic lactic acid bacteriumApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Isolation and identification of chlorate-reducingMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhenbo XuSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P.R. China.
Yuting LuoSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P.R. China.
Yuzhu MaoSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P.R. China.
Ruixin PengSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P.R. China.
Jinxuan ChenSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P.R. China.
Thanapop SoteyomeHome Economics Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon, Bangkok, Thailand.
Caiying BaiGuangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou 510010, P.R. China.
Ling ChenSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P.R. China.
Yi LiangGuangdong Zhongqing Font Biochemical Science and Technology Co. Ltd., Maoming, Guangdong 525427, P.R. China.
Jianyu SuSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P.R. China.
Kan WangResearch Center of Translational Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Junyan LiuDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Birthe V KjellerupDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
University of Maryland, College Park · USRajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon · THUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have caused many microbiological incidents in the brewing industry, resulting in severe economic loss. Meanwhile, traditional culturing method for detecting LAB are time-consuming for brewers. The present review introduces LAB as spoilage microbes in daily life, with focus on LAB in the brewing industry, targeting at the spoilage mechanism of LAB in brewing industry including the special metabolisms, the exist of the viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state and the hop resistance. At the same time, this review compares the traditional and novel rapid detection methods for these microorganisms which may provide innovative control and detection strategies for preventing alcoholic beverage spoilage, such as improvement of microbiological quality control using advanced culture media or different isothermal amplification methods.

Indexed as

Food IndustryFood MicrobiologyLactobacillalesBeerCulture MediaFood ContaminationFood SafetyCulture Mediabrewing industrydetection methodsLactic acid bacteriaspoilage mechanism

Identifiers

PMID31986245
PMCPMC9728350
OpenAlexW3006874511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.