ReviewSwiss medical weekly2020
Holistic cancer genome profiling for every patient.
Review in Swiss medical weekly, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Biterm Topic Model for Sparse Mutation Data.Cancers · 2023Article
- ScalpelSig Designs Targeted Genomic Panels from Data to Detect Activity of Mutational Signatures.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2022Article
- Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer using logistic regression.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2021Article
- Disease-Causing Mutations and Rearrangements in Long Non-coding RNA Gene Loci.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Technological advances in the ability to read the human genome have accelerated the speed of sequencing, such that today we can perform whole genome sequencing (WGS) in one day. Until recently, genomic studies have largely been limited to seeking novel scientific discoveries. The application of new insights gained through cancer WGS into the clinical domain, have been relatively limited. Looking ahead, a vast amount of data can be generated by genomic studies. Of note, excellent organisation of genomic and clinical data permits the application of machine-learning methods which can lead to the development of clinical algorithms that could assist future clinicians and genomicists in the analysis and interpretation of individual cancer genomes. Here, we describe what can be gleaned from holistic whole cancer genome profiling and argue that we must build the infrastructure and educational frameworks to support the modern clinical genomicist to prepare for a future where WGS will be the norm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.