Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31986185›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Affective state determination in a mouse model of colitis-associated colorectal cancer.

Lauren C Chartier, Michelle L Hebart, Gordon S Howarth, Alexandra L Whittaker, Suzanne Mashtoub

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review of Rat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  7. Grimace scale assessment duringFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Antinociceptive Effects of Kappa-Opioid Receptor Agonists.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Diagnostic Ability of Methods Depicting Distress of Tumor-Bearing Mice.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren C ChartierDiscipline of Physiology, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7068-627X
Michelle L HebartSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia.
Gordon S HowarthDepartment of Gastroenterology, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Alexandra L WhittakerSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9011-8296
Suzanne MashtoubDiscipline of Physiology, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AUWomen's and Children's Hospital · AUMurdoch University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioural indicators of affective state, including burrowing, clinical scores and the Mouse Grimace Score have not yet been validated in mouse models of chronic gastrointestinal disease. Additionally, a comparison of these methods has not been characterised. This study aimed to determine which behavioural assessment was the optimal indicator of disease, evidenced by correlation with clinically-assessed measures, in an azoxymethane (AOM)/dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) mouse model of colitis-associated colorectal cancer. C57BL/6 mice were allocated to four groups (n = 10/group); 1) saline control, 2) saline+buprenorphine, 3) AOM+DSS+water, 4) AOM+DSS+buprenorphine. Mice were gavaged thrice weekly with water or buprenorphine (0.5mg/kg; 80μL) for 9 weeks. Disease activity index (DAI) was measured daily; burrowing and grimace analyses occurred on days -1, 5, 19, 26, 40, 47 and 61. Colonoscopies were performed on days 20, 41 and 62. All animals were euthanized on day 63. Burrowing activity and retrospective grimace analyses were unaffected (P>0.05), whilst DAI was significantly increased (P<0.05) in mice with colitis-associated colorectal cancer compared to normal controls. In addition, DAI was positively correlated with colonoscopically-assessed severity and tumour number (P<0.05). We conclude that traditional measures of DAI or clinical scoring provide the most reliable assessment of wellbeing in mice with colitis-associated colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsAzoxymethaneBehaviorBuprenorphineColitisColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDextran SulfateDisease Models, AnimalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAzoxymethaneBuprenorphineDextran Sulfate

Identifiers

PMID31986185
PMCPMC6984705
OpenAlexW3001526259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.