Antibiotic stewardship in dentistry: Adopted by the General Assembly: September 2019, San Francisco, United States of America.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Ten-year trends in antimicrobial and analgesic prescribing by NHS dentists in England: a retrospective analysis study.British dental journal · 2026
   Article
2. Did the COVID-19 pandemic impact antibiotic prescribing patterns among dentists?Evidence-based dentistry · 2024
   Article
3. A survey of dental professionals' opinions around the use of antibiotics in molar 3 extractions and dental implant placement.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2024
   Article
4. Antibiotic Stewardship: Integrating a Crucial Element for Dental Practices, Education, and Patient Care.International dental journal · 2023
   Article
5. Perceptions of Antibiotic Use and Resistance: Are Antibiotics the Dentists' Anxiolytics?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as