Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31985749›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2020

Implications of Abnormal Exercise Electrocardiography With Normal Stress Echocardiography.

Melissa A Daubert, Joseph Sivak, Allison Dunning, Pamela S Douglas, Brian Coyne, Tracy Y Wang, Daniel B Mark, Eric J Velazquez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa A DaubertDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Joseph SivakDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Allison DunningDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Pamela S DouglasDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Brian CoyneDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Tracy Y WangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Daniel B MarkDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Eric J VelazquezDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Clinical Research Institute · USDuke Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with abnormal (positive) exercise electrocardiography, but normal stress echocardiography (+ECG/-Echo) are commonly encountered in clinical practice; however, the prognostic significance of this discordant result is unclear. Objective: To determine whether patients with +ECG/-Echo have a higher rate of adverse clinical events and a poorer prognosis than patients with negative exercise ECG and normal stress Echo imaging (-ECG/-Echo). Design, Setting, and Participants: Between January 1, 2000, and February 28, 2014, a total of 47 944 consecutive patients without known coronary artery disease who underwent exercise stress Echo at Duke University Medical Center were evaluated for inclusion in this observational cohort study. Data analysis was conducted from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016. Interventions/Exposures: Patients were categorized as having -ECG/-Echo, +ECG/-Echo, or +Echo (-ECG/+Echo and +ECG/+Echo). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, and coronary revascularization. Secondary outcomes included individual adverse events and downstream testing. Results: After excluding submaximal tests and nondiagnostic ECG or stress imaging results, 15 077 patients (mean [SD] age, 52 [13] years; 6228 [41.3%] men) were classified by stress test results. Of these, 12 893 patients (85.5%) had -ECG/-Echo, 1286 patients (8.5%) had +ECG/-Echo, and 898 patients (6.0%) had +Echo. Through a median follow-up of 7.3 (interquartile range, 4.4-10.0) years, the composite end point occurred in 794 patients with -ECG/-Echo (8.5%), 142 patients with +ECG/-Echo (14.6%), and 297 patients with +Echo (37.4%). Death occurred in 425 patients with -ECG/-Echo (4.8%), 50 patients with +ECG/-Echo (5.9%), and 70 patients with +Echo (11.2%). Myocardial infarction occurred in 195 patients with -ECG/-Echo (2.2%), 31 patients with +ECG/-Echo (3.6%), and 59 patients with +Echo (8.7%). The addition of stress ECG findings to clinical and exercise data yielded incremental prognostic value. Patients with -ECG/-Echo imaging results had the least downstream testing (2.3%), followed by +ECG/-Echo (12.8%), and +Echo (33.6%) (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The presence of +ECG results with normal stress Echo imaging may identify a population of patients who are at slightly increased risk for adverse cardiac events, which was not previously recognized. Further study is needed to determine whether these patients will benefit from intensification of medical management.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, StressElectrocardiographyExercise TestCoronary DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID31985749
PMCPMC6990669
OpenAlexW3001068790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.