ArticleJAMA internal medicine2020
Implications of Abnormal Exercise Electrocardiography With Normal Stress Echocardiography.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic assessment of global longitudinal strain after isometric exercise to predict functionally significant coronary lesion.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease and discordant findings on exercise stress echocardiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Multimodality Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease in Latin American Women from IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Collaboratory.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Predicting angiographic coronary artery disease using machine learning and high-frequency QRS.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Stress Echocardiography for Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Clinical Practice Guidelines (2023).Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2024Article
- Association of abnormal electrocardiography response on dobutamine stress echocardiogram with longer-term major adverse cardiovascular events in women with symptoms of ischemic heart disease.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2023Article
- Chest Pain Evaluation: Diagnostic Testing.CJC open · 2023Review
- Exaggerated Systolic Blood Pressure Increase with Exercise and Myocardial Ischemia on Exercise Stress Echocardiography.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Article
- Exercise Stress Echocardiography for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Succumbed to the Modern Conceptual Revolution or Still Alive and Kicking?Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Role of Exercise Treadmill Testing in the Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Disease.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Gender-Related Differences in Chest Pain Syndromes in the Frontiers in CV Medicine Special Issue: Sex & Gender in CV Medicine.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Relationship of Stress Test Findings to Anatomic or Functional Extent of Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Sixty years of the Bruce protocol: reappraising the contemporary role of exercise stress testing with electrocardiographic monitoring.Porto biomedical journalReview
- Stress electrocardiography testing in coronary artery disease: Is it time for its swan song or to redefine its role in the modern era ?Indian heart journalReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Patients with abnormal (positive) exercise electrocardiography, but normal stress echocardiography (+ECG/-Echo) are commonly encountered in clinical practice; however, the prognostic significance of this discordant result is unclear. Objective: To determine whether patients with +ECG/-Echo have a higher rate of adverse clinical events and a poorer prognosis than patients with negative exercise ECG and normal stress Echo imaging (-ECG/-Echo). Design, Setting, and Participants: Between January 1, 2000, and February 28, 2014, a total of 47 944 consecutive patients without known coronary artery disease who underwent exercise stress Echo at Duke University Medical Center were evaluated for inclusion in this observational cohort study. Data analysis was conducted from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016. Interventions/Exposures: Patients were categorized as having -ECG/-Echo, +ECG/-Echo, or +Echo (-ECG/+Echo and +ECG/+Echo). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, and coronary revascularization. Secondary outcomes included individual adverse events and downstream testing. Results: After excluding submaximal tests and nondiagnostic ECG or stress imaging results, 15 077 patients (mean [SD] age, 52 [13] years; 6228 [41.3%] men) were classified by stress test results. Of these, 12 893 patients (85.5%) had -ECG/-Echo, 1286 patients (8.5%) had +ECG/-Echo, and 898 patients (6.0%) had +Echo. Through a median follow-up of 7.3 (interquartile range, 4.4-10.0) years, the composite end point occurred in 794 patients with -ECG/-Echo (8.5%), 142 patients with +ECG/-Echo (14.6%), and 297 patients with +Echo (37.4%). Death occurred in 425 patients with -ECG/-Echo (4.8%), 50 patients with +ECG/-Echo (5.9%), and 70 patients with +Echo (11.2%). Myocardial infarction occurred in 195 patients with -ECG/-Echo (2.2%), 31 patients with +ECG/-Echo (3.6%), and 59 patients with +Echo (8.7%). The addition of stress ECG findings to clinical and exercise data yielded incremental prognostic value. Patients with -ECG/-Echo imaging results had the least downstream testing (2.3%), followed by +ECG/-Echo (12.8%), and +Echo (33.6%) (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The presence of +ECG results with normal stress Echo imaging may identify a population of patients who are at slightly increased risk for adverse cardiac events, which was not previously recognized. Further study is needed to determine whether these patients will benefit from intensification of medical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.