Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31985746›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2020

Blood Pressure Thresholds and Neurologic Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Mads Rasmussen, Silvia Schönenberger, Pia Löwhagen Hendèn, Jan B Valentin, Ulrick S Espelund, Leif H Sørensen, Niels Juul, Lorenz Uhlmann, Søren P Johnsen, Alexandros Rentzos and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04578288 (Individualized Blood Pressure Management During Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Under Procedural Sedation), which is not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04578288 nacompletednot on this map

Individualized Blood Pressure Management During Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Under Procedural Sedation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital HeidelbergRan2020 to 2022Enrolled250ConditionsAcute Ischemic StrokeArmsINDIVIDUALIZED BLOOD PRESSURE MANAGEMENT DURING ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE UNDER PROCEDURAL SEDATION
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Impact of multidisciplinary simulation training on endovascular thrombectomy: Workflow, patient outcomes and anaesthetic management.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Individualized autoregulation-guided arterial blood pressure management in neurocritical care.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  20. Brain health: A concern for anaesthesiologists and intensivists.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2024
    Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Mads RasmussenDepartment of Anesthesia, Section of Neuroanesthesia, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Silvia SchönenbergerDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pia Löwhagen HendènDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jan B ValentinDanish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ulrick S EspelundDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Regional Hospital in Horsens, Horsens, Denmark.
Leif H SørensenDepartment of Neuroradiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Niels JuulDepartment of Anesthesia, Section of Neuroanesthesia, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lorenz UhlmannInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Søren P JohnsenDanish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Alexandros RentzosDepartment of Radiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Julian BöselDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Claus Z SimonsenDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
SAGA collaborators
Aarhus University Hospital · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKHeidelberg University · DEKlinikum Kassel · DERegional Hospital Horsens · DKSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The optimal blood pressure targets during endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are unknown. Objective: To study whether procedural blood pressure parameters, including specific blood pressure thresholds, are associated with neurologic outcomes after EVT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included adults with anterior-circulation AIS who were enrolled in randomized clinical trials assessing anesthetic strategy for EVT between February 2014 and February 2017. The trials had comparable blood pressure protocols, and patients were followed up for 90 days. A total of 3630 patients were initially approached, and 3265 patients were excluded. Exposure: Endovascular therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy variable was functional outcome as defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Associations of blood pressure parameters and time less than and greater than mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) thresholds with outcome were analyzed. Results: Of the 365 patients included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 71.4 (13.0) years, 163 were women (44.6%), and the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 17 (interquartile range [IQR], 14-21). For the entire cohort, 182 (49.9%) received general anesthesia and 183 (50.1%) received procedural sedation. A cumulated period of minimum 10 minutes with less than 70 mm Hg MABP (adjusted OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.02-2.22) and a continuous episode of minimum 20 minutes with less than 70 mm Hg MABP (adjusted OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.11-4.75) were associated with a shift toward higher 90-day mRS scores, corresponding to a number needed to harm of 10 and 4, respectively. A cumulated period of minimum 45 minutes with greater than 90 mm Hg MABP (adjusted OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11-2.02) and a continuous episode of minimum 115 minutes with greater than 90 mm Hg MABP (adjusted OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.01-3.54) were associated with a shift toward higher 90-day mRS scores, corresponding to a number needed to harm of 10 and 6, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Critical MABP thresholds and durations for poor outcome were found to be MABP less than 70 mm Hg for more than 10 minutes and MABP greater than 90 mm Hg for more than 45 minutes, both durations with a number needed to harm of 10 patients. Mean arterial blood pressure may be a modifiable therapeutic target to prevent or reduce poor functional outcome after EVT.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresRecovery of FunctionAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesia, GeneralBlood PressureFemaleHumansIschemic StrokeMaleMiddle AgedProcedural SedationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID31985746
PMCPMC6990929
OpenAlexW3002750652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.