Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31985634›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2020

Bone Tissue Engineering in the Growing Calvaria Using Dipyridamole-Coated, Three-Dimensionally-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds: Construct Optimization and Effects on Cranial Suture Patency.

Samantha G Maliha, Christopher D Lopez, Paulo G Coelho, Lukasz Witek, Madison Cox, Alan Meskin, Sejndi Rusi, Andrea Torroni, Bruce N Cronstein, Roberto L Flores

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Biofabrication - Revolutionizing the future of regenerative periodontics.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Recent advances in additive manufacturing of patient-specific devices for dental and maxillofacial rehabilitation.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Employing Indirect Adenosine 2Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha G MalihaFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health; New York University School of Medicine; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the Department of Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry; and the Division of Translational Medicine, New York University School of Medicine.
Christopher D LopezFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health; New York University School of Medicine; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the Department of Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry; and the Division of Translational Medicine, New York University School of Medicine.
Paulo G CoelhoFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health; New York University School of Medicine; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the Department of Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry; and the Division of Translational Medicine, New York University School of Medicine.
Lukasz WitekFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health; New York University School of Medicine; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the Department of Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry; and the Division of Translational Medicine, New York University School of Medicine.
Madison CoxFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health; New York University School of Medicine; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the Department of Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry; and the Division of Translational Medicine, New York University School of Medicine.
Alan MeskinFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health; New York University School of Medicine; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the Department of Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry; and the Division of Translational Medicine, New York University School of Medicine.
Sejndi RusiFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health; New York University School of Medicine; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the Department of Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry; and the Division of Translational Medicine, New York University School of Medicine.
Andrea TorroniFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health; New York University School of Medicine; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the Department of Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry; and the Division of Translational Medicine, New York University School of Medicine.
Bruce N CronsteinFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health; New York University School of Medicine; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the Department of Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry; and the Division of Translational Medicine, New York University School of Medicine.
Roberto L FloresFrom the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health; New York University School of Medicine; the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; the Department of Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry; and the Division of Translational Medicine, New York University School of Medicine.
New York University · USUniversity School · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
Engineering Personalized Devices for Craniomaxillofacial DefectsR33HD090664 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CRONSTEIN, BRUCE NEIL, FLORES, ROBERTO L · 2019 to 2021
$1.2M
Engineering Personalized Devices for Craniomaxillofacial DefectsR21HD090664 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI COELHO, PAULO G, CRONSTEIN, BRUCE NEIL · 2017 to 2018
$452k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD090664NICHD NIH HHS R33 HD090664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThree-dimensionally-printed bioceramic scaffolds composed of β-tricalcium phosphate delivering the osteogenic agent dipyridamole can heal critically sized calvarial defects in skeletally mature translational models. However, this construct has yet to be applied to growing craniofacial models. In this study, the authors implanted three-dimensionally-printed bioceramic/dipyridamole scaffolds in a growing calvaria animal model and evaluated bone growth as a function of geometric scaffold design and dipyridamole concentration. Potential adverse effects on the growing suture were also evaluated.

methodsBilateral calvarial defects (10 mm) were created in 5-week-old (approximately 1.1 kg) New Zealand White rabbits (n = 16 analyzed). Three-dimensionally-printed bioceramic scaffolds were constructed in quadrant form composed of varying pore dimensions (220, 330, and 500 μm). Each scaffold was coated with collagen and soaked in varying concentrations of dipyridamole (100, 1000, and 10,000 μM). Controls consisted of empty defects. Animals were killed 8 weeks postoperatively. Calvariae were analyzed using micro-computed tomography, three-dimensional reconstruction, and nondecalcified histologic sectioning.

resultsScaffold-induced bone growth was statistically greater than bone growth in empty defects (p = 0.02). Large scaffold pores, 500 μm, coated in 1000 μM dipyridamole yielded the most bone growth and lowest degree of scaffold presence within the defect. Histology showed vascularized woven and lamellar bone along with initial formation of vascular canals within the scaffold lattice. Micro-computed tomographic and histologic analysis revealed patent calvarial sutures without evidence of ectopic bone formation across all dipyridamole concentrations.

conclusionThe authors present an effective pediatric bone tissue-engineering scaffold design and dipyridamole concentration that is effective in augmentation of calvarial bone generation while preserving cranial suture patency.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBone RegenerationCalcium PhosphatesDipyridamoleDisease Models, AnimalRabbitsSkullSkull FracturesTissue Engineeringbeta-tricalcium phosphateCalcium PhosphatesDipyridamole

Identifiers

PMID31985634
PMCPMC7212767
OpenAlexW2990339659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.