Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31985583›Full record

ArticleMedical care2020

Quality of Care in Chronic Kidney Disease and Incidence of End-stage Renal Disease in Older Patients: A Cohort Study.

Shingo Fukuma, Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue, Sayaka Shimizu, Edward C Norton, Rajiv Saran, Motoko Yanagita, Genta Kato, Takeo Nakayama, Shunichi Fukuhara, and on behalf of BiDANE: Big Data Analysis of Medical Care for the Older in Kyoto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shingo FukumaDepartment of Human Health Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Tatsuyoshi IkenoueDepartment of Human Health Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Sayaka ShimizuDepartment of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Edward C NortonDepartments of Health Management and Policy.
Rajiv SaranDepartments of Internal Medicine.
Motoko YanagitaDepartment of Nephrology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Genta KatoSolutions Center for Health Insurance Claims, Kyoto University Hospital.
Takeo NakayamaDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto.
Shunichi FukuharaDepartment of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
and on behalf of BiDANE: Big Data Analysis of Medical Care for the Older in Kyoto
Kyoto University · JPUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USKyoto University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe quality of care received by a growing number of older patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been adequately examined.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the quality of CKD care among older patients and to clarify its association with the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). RESEARCH

designThis was a population-based cohort study. SUBJECTS: Older (65 y and above) CKD patients diagnosed between October 2010 and September 2014 from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims of Japan. MEASURES: A composite quality score (QS) of 3 quality measures for CKD care during the 6 months after CKD diagnosis was computed. The validated quality measures included urine testing for proteinuria, nutritional guidance, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs avoidance. To assess the association between the QS and ESRD incidence, we used instrumental variable analysis after stratification for the history of diabetes.

resultsAmong the 890,773 older CKD patients, 2.9% progressed to ESRD (incidence rate of 12.5 per thousand person-years). In total, 59.9% underwent urine testing, 4.5% received nutritional guidance, and 91.2% avoided regular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. An instrumental variable analysis revealed that a higher QS was associated with-lower ESRD incidence in patients diagnosed with diabetes (hazard ratio: 0.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.24-0.27 for each point higher score) but not in patients without a diagnosis of diabetes (hazard ratio: 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.92-1.05).

conclusionAmong older CKD patients, quality of CKD care varied between patients, and better quality of CKD care was associated with a lower ESRD incidence in patients with diabetes but not in nondiabetic patients.

Indexed as

IncidenceAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansJapanKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health CareRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID31985583
PMCPMC7289129
OpenAlexW3003524376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.