Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31985011›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2021

Human Papillomavirus Genotype Replacement: Still Too Early to Tell?

Irene Man, Simopekka Vänskä, Matti Lehtinen, Johannes A Bogaards

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. HPV Type Replacement After HPV Vaccination.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Data-Related Challenges in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Vaccines.Applied health economics and health policy · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Irene ManCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3177-6904
Simopekka VänskäInfectious Disease Control and Vaccinations, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Matti LehtinenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johannes A BogaardsCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.
German Cancer Research Center · DELeiden University Medical Center · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLTampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are highly efficacious in protecting against HPV infections and related diseases, vaccination may trigger replacement by nontargeted genotypes if these compete with the vaccine-targeted types. HPV genotype replacement has been deemed unlikely, based on the lack of systematic increases in the prevalence of nonvaccine-type (NVT) infection in the first decade after vaccination, and on the presence of cross-protection for some NVTs.

methodsTo investigate whether type replacement can be inferred from early postvaccination surveillance, we constructed a transmission model in which a vaccine type and an NVT compete through infection-induced cross-immunity. We simulated scenarios of different levels of cross-immunity and vaccine-induced cross-protection to the NVT. We validated whether commonly used measures correctly indicate type replacement in the long run.

resultsType replacement is a trade-off between cross-immunity and cross-protection; cross-immunity leads to type replacement unless cross-protection is strong enough. With weak cross-protection, NVT prevalence may initially decrease before rebounding into type replacement, exhibiting a honeymoon period. Importantly, vaccine effectiveness for NVTs is inadequate for indicating type replacement.

conclusionsAlthough postvaccination surveillance thus far is reassuring, it is still too early to preclude type replacement. Monitoring of NVTs remains pivotal in gauging population-level impacts of HPV vaccination.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesGenotypeHumansPapillomaviridaeVaccine EfficacyPapillomavirus Vaccinescompetitioncross-immunitycross-protectionhoneymoon periodtype replacementvaccinationvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID31985011
PMCPMC8328199
OpenAlexW3004335460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.