Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31984521›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2020

Behavioral Flexibility in Alcohol-Drinking Monkeys: The Morning After.

Tatiana A Shnitko, Steven W Gonzales, Natali Newman, Kathleen A Grant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A Little "Re-Cognition" Goes a Long Way for Pro-Cognitive Therapeutics in Alcohol Studies.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tatiana A ShnitkoFrom the, Division of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center (ONPRC), Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-7872-7408
Steven W GonzalesFrom the, Division of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center (ONPRC), Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.
Natali NewmanFrom the, Division of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center (ONPRC), Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.
Kathleen A GrantFrom the, Division of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center (ONPRC), Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-0380-7219

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
Translational measures of risk for excessive alcohol consumptionP60AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TAMARA J. PHILLIPS · 2006 to 2026
$34.5M
Stress and Ethanol Self-Administration in MonkeysU01AA013510 · NIAAA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KATHLEEN A GRANT · 2002 to 2026
$11.8M
Monkey Alcohol Tissue Research Resource (MATRR)R24AA019431 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Mary Lauren Benton, Verginia Carmella Cuzon Carlson · 2010 to 2026
$10.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS R24 AA019431NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA013510NIH HHS P51 OD011092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeavy alcohol drinking has aspects of inflexible behavior. This study addressed the consequences of chronic alcohol drinking on cognitive and sensory-motor domains of behavioral flexibility in rhesus monkeys.

methodsBehavioral flexibility was assessed in 12 monkeys (n = 9, ethanol [EtOH] drinkers) with a set-shifting visual discrimination procedure before alcohol self-administration and while maintaining consumption of 1.5 g/kg/d EtOH. Task performance was assessed in the morning after ~18 hours of drinking 1.5 g/kg, and 1 hour before the next day's drinking session began. The first 10 set-shifting sessions had the original (preethanol) test parameters and were used to determine retention of preethanol performance. Then, an effect of sensory-motor challenge (60% reduction in the size of the discriminative stimuli) on performance was assessed during 10 additional sessions.

resultsThere were no average group-dependent differences in the performance between control and EtOH groups at the preethanol time-point. The daily consumption of 1.5 g/kg/d produced binge alcohol intakes in 7 of 9 monkeys (blood EtOH concentration [BEC ≥ 80 mg/dl]). Chronic daily intakes of 1.5 g/kg had no effect on retention of the task in the sober state. However, when challenged with a reduction in the size of the stimuli, daily 1.5 g/kg EtOH resulted in a decrement in performance due to an increase in the number of errors.

conclusionsRhesus monkeys consuming 1.5 g/kg alcohol daily perform equally as could as control monkeys in retention of a well-learned cognitive task. However, this pattern of daily alcohol intake robustly decreased the ability to flexibly adjust behavior when confronted with novel changes to perceptual stimuli.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBinge DrinkingBlood Alcohol ContentCognitionEthanolMacaca mulattaMalePhotic StimulationSensorimotor CortexBlood Alcohol ContentEthanolAlcohol AbuseLate AdolescenceRhesus MacaquesSet Shifting

Identifiers

PMID31984521
PMCPMC7236888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.