Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31984462›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Phytoremediation of heavy metals by four aquatic macrophytes and their potential use as contamination indicators: a comparative assessment.

Ebrahem M Eid, Tarek M Galal, Nasser A Sewelam, Nasser I Talha, Samy M Abdallah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. In Situ Remediation Technology for Heavy Metal Contaminated Sediment: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Effect of Pb-Contaminated Water onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ebrahem M EidBiology Department, College of Science, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004, Abha, 61321, Saudi Arabia. ebrahem.eid@sci.kfs.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2452-4469
Tarek M GalalBiology Department, Faculty of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Nasser A SewelamBotany Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta, 31527, Egypt.
Nasser I TalhaSoil, Water and Environment Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Sakha, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt.
Samy M AbdallahBiology Department, College of Science, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004, Abha, 61321, Saudi Arabia.
Kafrelsheikh University · EGKing Khalid University · SATaif University · SATanta University · EG

Funding

the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University R.G.P. 1/94/40
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study estimated the ability of four aquatic macrophytes (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms, Ludwigia stolonifera (Guill. & Perr.) P.H. Raven, Echinochloa stagnina (Retz.) P. Beauv. and Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.) to accumulate Cd, Ni and Pb and their use for indicating and phytoremediating these metals in contaminated wetlands. Three sites at five locations in the Kitchener Drain in Gharbia and Kafr El-Sheikh Governorates (Egypt) were selected for plant, water and sediment sampling. The water in the Kitchener Drain was polluted with Cd, while Pb and Ni were far below the maximum level of Pb and Ni in the irrigation water. In comparison to the other species, P. australis accumulated the highest concentrations of Cd and Ni, while E. crassipes accumulated the highest concentration of Pb in its tissues. The four species had bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) greater than one, while their translocation factors (TFs) were less than 1 for most heavy metals, except Cd in the leaf and stem of E. stagnina and L. stolonifera, respectively, and Ni in the stem and leaf of E. stagnina. The BAF and TF results indicated that the studied species are suitable for phytostabilizing the studied heavy metals, except Ni in E. stagnina and Cd in L. stolonifera, which are suitable for phytoextracting these metals. Significant positive correlations were found between the investigated heavy metals in the water or sediment and the plant tissues. Their high BAFs, with significant proportional correlations, supported the potential of these species to serve as bioindicators and biomonitors of heavy metals in general and in the investigated metals specifically.

Indexed as

EichhorniaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEgyptMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalBioindicatorEchinochloa stagninaEichhornia crassipesLudwigia stoloniferaPhragmites australisWater pollution

Identifiers

PMID31984462
OpenAlexW3003023900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.