Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31984448›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020

Colistin resistance in Gram-negative ocular infections: prevalence, clinical outcome and antibiotic susceptibility patterns.

Sanchita Mitra, Soumyava Basu, Suryasnata Rath, Srikant Kumar Sahu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Emergence of Colistin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Occurrence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanchita MitraOcular Microbiology Laboratory, L V Prasad Eye Institute, MTC Campus, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751024, India. sanchita034@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2773-3568
Soumyava BasuRetina and Uveitis Service, Bhubaneswar, India.
Suryasnata RathOphthalmic Plastics, Orbit and Ocular Oncology Service, Bhubaneswar, India.
Srikant Kumar SahuCornea and Anterior Segment Service, L V Prasad Eye Institute, MTC Campus, Bhubaneswar, India.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study the prevalence, antibiotic susceptibility profile, clinical outcomes and plasmid-mediated transfer of colistin resistance (CLR) among Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) isolates from different ocular infections.

designProspective case-control study in eastern India.

methodsConsecutive ocular samples with GNB isolates from clinically diagnosed cases of microbial keratitis, infectious endophthalmitis and orbital infections were included. Inclusion criteria were significant GNB growth from ocular samples and > 6 weeks follow-up. Clinical outcomes were determined by disease-specific criteria for each clinical group. Antibiotic susceptibility was tested by broth microdilution for colistin and Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method for others. Plasmid detection for CLR genes mcr-1 and mcr-2 genes was done by standard protocols.

resultsSixty GNB isolates were studied. Overall prevalence of CLR (intrinsic plus acquired) was 40% (n = 24), acquired being 37.5% of CLR isolates (n = 9). The prevalence varied from 45.5% (10/22) and 45% (9/20) in microbial keratitis and infectious endophthalmitis, respectively, to 26.3% (5/19) in orbital infections. Clinical outcomes in CLR patients were significantly worse in microbial keratitis (p = 0.018) and orbital infections (p = 0.018), and comparable to colistin-susceptible ones (p = 0.77) in infectious endophthalmitis. CLR isolates had significantly higher resistance to Amikacin, Gentamicin and Ceftazidime but were susceptible to Piperacillin, Carbapenems and fluoroquinolones. Plasmids mcr-1 and mcr-2 were detected in 6.25% (n = 1) and 25%(n = 4), respectively, of the 16 tested isolates.

conclusionsCLR is highly prevalent in ocular isolates and affects clinical outcomes. CLR isolates may still remain susceptible to Carbapenems, Piperacillin and fluoroquinolones. Plasmid mcr-1- and mcr-2-mediated CLR remains low in ocular infections.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsCase-Control StudiesColistinEye Infections, BacterialFollow-Up StudiesGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansIndiaPrevalencePrognosisProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistinAntimicrobial resistanceColistinGram-negative infectionsOcular infectionsPlasmid

Identifiers

PMID31984448
OpenAlexW3002832726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.