Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31984441›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2020

Evolution of olfactory circuits in insects.

Zhilei Zhao, Carolyn S McBride

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An integrated anatomical, functional and evolutionary view of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genetics and the Evolution of Prezygotic Isolation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhilei ZhaoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA. zhileiz@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6624-6853
Carolyn S McBrideDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA. csm7@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8898-1768

Funding

Mapping the combinatorial olfactory inputs that drive mosquito host attractionDP2AI144246 · NIAID · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MCBRIDE, CAROLYN SARAH · 2018 to 2018
$2.4M
Genetic Analysis of Mosquito Olfactory Preference for HumansR00DC012069 · NIDCD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MCBRIDE, CAROLYN SARAH · 2014 to 2016
$738k
NIAID NIH HHS DP2 AI144246NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC012069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen an explosion of interest in the evolution of neural circuits. Comparison of animals from different families, orders, and phyla reveals fascinating variation in brain morphology, circuit structure, and neural cell types. However, it can be difficult to connect the complex changes that occur across long evolutionary distances to behavior. Luckily, these changes accumulate through processes that should also be observable in recent time, making more tractable comparisons of closely related species relevant and complementary. Here, we review several decades of research on the evolution of insect olfactory circuits across short evolutionary time scales. We describe two well-studied systems, Drosophila sechellia flies and Heliothis moths, in detailed case studies. We then move through key types of circuit evolution, cataloging examples from other insects and looking for general patterns. The literature is dominated by changes in sensory neuron number and tuning at the periphery-often enhancing neural response to odorants with new ecological or social relevance. However, changes in the way olfactory information is processed by central circuits is clearly important in a few cases, and we suspect the development of genetic tools in non-model species will reveal a broad role for central circuit evolution. Moving forward, such tools should also be used to rigorously test causal links between brain evolution and behavior.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalBiological EvolutionOdorantsSmellAnimalsBrainDrosophilaEvolution, MolecularMothsNeural PathwaysOlfactory PerceptionOlfactory Receptor NeuronsSpecies SpecificityDrosophila sechelliaEvolutionInsectsNeural circuitsOlfaction

Identifiers

PMID31984441
PMCPMC7192870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.