Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31984365›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2019

Detecting reports of unsafe foods in consumer product reviews.

Adyasha Maharana, Kunlin Cai, Joseph Hellerstein, Yulin Hswen, Michael Munsell, Valentina Staneva, Miki Verma, Cynthia Vint, Derry Wijaya, Elaine O Nsoesie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial intelligence in food safety.NPJ science of food · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adyasha MaharanaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Kunlin CaiDepartment of Computer Science, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joseph HellersteineScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Yulin HswenComputational Epidemiology Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA.
Michael MunsellDepartment of Economics, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Valentina StanevaeScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Miki VermaApplied and Computational Mathematical Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Cynthia VintComputer and Information Systems, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Derry WijayaDepartment of Computer Science, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Elaine O NsoesieDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAccess to safe and nutritious food is essential for good health. However, food can become unsafe due to contamination with pathogens, chemicals or toxins, or mislabeling of allergens. Illness resulting from the consumption of unsafe foods is a global health problem. Here, we develop a machine learning approach for detecting reports of unsafe food products in consumer product reviews from Amazon.com. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe linked Amazon.com food product reviews to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food recalls from 2012 to 2014 using text matching approaches in a PostGres relational database. We applied machine learning methods and over- and under-sampling methods to the linked data to automate the detection of reports of unsafe food products.

resultsOur data consisted of 1 297 156 product reviews from Amazon.com. Only 5149 (0.4%) were linked to recalled food products. Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformations performed best in identifying unsafe food reviews, achieving an F1 score, precision and recall of 0.74, 0.78, and 0.71, respectively. We also identified synonyms for terms associated with FDA recalls in more than 20 000 reviews, most of which were associated with nonrecalled products. This might suggest that many more products should have been recalled or investigated. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionChallenges to improving food safety include, urbanization which has led to a longer food chain, underreporting of illness and difficulty in linking contaminated food to illness. Our approach can improve food safety by enabling early identification of unsafe foods which can lead to timely recall thereby limiting the health and economic impact on the public.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconsumer product safetyfood and drug administrationfood safetymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID31984365
PMCPMC6951857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.