ArticleJAMIA open2019
Evaluating a handheld decision support device in pediatric intensive care settings.
Article in JAMIA open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying the data elements and functionalities of clinical decision support systems to administer medication for neonates and pediatrics: a systematic literature review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Pooled it
- Stakeholder Perspectives of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Automation in nursing decision support systems: A systematic review of effects on decision making, care delivery, and patient outcomes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Pooled it
- Confronting complexity: toward equitable healthcare technology design and evaluation for socioeconomically marginalized patients.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- A Mobile Application to Reduce Time to Calculate Medication Dosage and Medication Administration Errors in Simulated Pediatric and Neonatal Settings: A Research Protocol for a Cross-Over, Randomized Controlled Trial.Health science reports · 2025Article
- The barriers and challenges of using health information technology in medication administration process for pediatrics and neonates: A qualitative study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Handheld Computer Devices to Support Clinical Decision-making in Acute Nursing Practice: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Usability study of a new tool for nutritional and glycemic management in adult intensive care: Glucosafe 2.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2021Article
- Heuristics used for evaluating the usability of mobile health applications: A systematic literature review.Digital healthReview
- Exploring the Need for Health Information Technology Adoption in the Pediatric and Neonatal Medication Administration Process: A Qualitative Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate end-user acceptance and the effect of a commercial handheld decision support device in pediatric intensive care settings. The technology, pac2, was designed to assist nurses in calculating medication dose volumes and infusion rates at the bedside. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe devices, manufactured by InformMed Inc., were deployed in the pediatric and neonatal intensive care units in 2 health systems. This mixed methods study assessed end-user acceptance, as well as pac2's effect on the cognitive load associated with bedside dose calculations and the rate of administration errors. Towards this end, data were collected in both pre- and postimplementation phases, including through ethnographic observations, semistructured interviews, and surveys.
resultsAlthough participants desired a handheld decision support tool such as pac2, their use of pac2 was limited. The nature of the critical care environment, nurses' risk perceptions, and the usability of the technology emerged as major barriers to use. Data did not reveal significant differences in cognitive load or administration errors after pac2 was deployed. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionDespite its potential for reducing adverse medication events, the commercial standalone device evaluated in the study was not used by the nursing participants and thus had very limited effect. Our results have implications for the development and deployment of similar mobile decision support technologies. For example, they suggest that integrating the technology into hospitals' existing IT infrastructure and employing targeted implementation strategies may facilitate nurse acceptance. Ultimately, the usability of the design will be essential to reaping any potential benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.