Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31984320›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2018

Patient similarity by joint matrix trifactorization to identify subgroups in acute myeloid leukemia.

F Vitali, S Marini, D Pala, A Demartini, S Montoli, A Zambelli, R Bellazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Simplicity within biological complexity.Bioinformatics advances · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Linear functional organization of the omic embedding space.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Towards a data-integrated cell.Nature communications · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

F VitaliCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Biostatistics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2916-6402
S MariniDepartment of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
D PalaDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, PV, Italy.
A DemartiniDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, PV, Italy.
S MontoliDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, PV, Italy.
A ZambelliOncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, BG, Italy.
R BellazziDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, PV, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComputing patients' similarity is of great interest in precision oncology since it supports clustering and subgroup identification, eventually leading to tailored therapies. The availability of large amounts of biomedical data, characterized by large feature sets and sparse content, motivates the development of new methods to compute patient similarities able to fuse heterogeneous data sources with the available knowledge. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this work, we developed a data integration approach based on matrix trifactorization to compute patient similarities by integrating several sources of data and knowledge. We assess the accuracy of the proposed method: (1) on several synthetic data sets which similarity structures are affected by increasing levels of noise and data sparsity, and (2) on a real data set coming from an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) study. The results obtained are finally compared with the ones of traditional similarity calculation methods.

resultsIn the analysis of the synthetic data set, where the ground truth is known, we measured the capability of reconstructing the correct clusters, while in the AML study we evaluated the Kaplan-Meier curves obtained with the different clusters and measured their statistical difference by means of the log-rank test. In presence of noise and sparse data, our data integration method outperform other techniques, both in the synthetic and in the AML data. DISCUSSION: In case of multiple heterogeneous data sources, a matrix trifactorization technique can successfully fuse all the information in a joint model. We demonstrated how this approach can be efficiently applied to discover meaningful patient similarities and therefore may be considered a reliable data driven strategy for the definition of new research hypothesis for precision oncology.

conclusionThe better performance of the proposed approach presents an advantage over previous methods to provide accurate patient similarities supporting precision medicine.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukemia (AML)data integrationmatrix trifactorizationpatient similarityprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID31984320
PMCPMC6951984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.