Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31984293›Full record

ArticlePain reports

State of clinical pain research in Nepal: a systematic scoping review.

Saurab Sharma, Mark P Jensen, Anupa Pathak, Sweekriti Sharma, Mukesh Pokharel, J Haxby Abbott

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding children's pain assessment and management in Nepal.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The physiotherapy workforce in Nepal: A national survey.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2023
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saurab SharmaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Mark P JensenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anupa PathakCentre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Sweekriti SharmaSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Mukesh PokharelDepartment of Physiotherapy, Annapurna Neurological Institute and Allied Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
J Haxby AbbottCentre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before determining the pain research priorities for a country, a comprehensive literature review of existing research is warranted. We aimed to (1) identify and describe the extent and nature of pain research performed in Nepal, (2) identify existing knowledge and significant knowledge gaps, and (3) provide recommendations for future studies. We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature, in accordance with recommended guidelines. We searched local and international databases to identify research conducted in Nepal on individuals with a diagnosis of clinical pain conditions. A pair of independent reviewers screened the studies for inclusion. We identified 1396 records and included 116 studies. Most studies were published in Nepalese journals (75%) and were conducted in clinical settings (73%). Postsurgical pain was the most commonly studied pain condition (33%), followed by musculoskeletal pain (16%), headache (14%), and low back pain (13%). The most common research topics, in order of frequency, were (1) medical management (40%), (2) pain prevalence/incidence (21%), (3) diagnostic procedures (15%), (4) surgical management (8%), and (5) patient-reported outcome measurement (8%). Research gaps and potential areas of research waste were identified. Although a large number of research articles about pain in Nepal have been published, the majority of these have focused on the biomedical diagnosis and management of pain. Other topic areas (eg, psychological and social aspects of pain) are under-represented. The findings may inform future research directions for maximizing the knowledge that could be gained.

Indexed as

Back painChronic painDeveloping countriesHeadacheMusculoskeletal painNepalPainPain managementPostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID31984293
PMCPMC6903326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.